Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNguyen Trong Hoai-
dc.contributor.otherNguyen Luu Bao Doan-
dc.identifier.issn1859 -1124-
dc.description.abstractThis research is funded by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number II4.5-2012.09<br>\r\nIn the last decades scientists around the world have come to a consensus that the survival of humanity is threatened by rising climate changes if people continue to consume and produce in the same way as it has been. According to different analyses including those commissioned by the World Bank, Vietnam is among the countries to be heavily impacted by a rise in sea level caused by the melt of Northern and Southern ice caps. Therefore, as a member of the global community, the Vietnamese government and people must also share the responsibility to address the problem of climate change and act accordingly. Recycling to reduce landfill development, saving energy and water consumption, and curtailing CO2 emission are examples of behavior attributable to the alleviation of environmental degradation. This current study, funded by NAFOSTED, aims at exploring impacts of consumers’ attitude on their household recycling behavior. The study contributes to the existing general discussion about possible attitude-behavior relationship by exploiting structural equation modeling (SEM) with data from the two major cities in Southern Vietnam. This method allows for an examination of multiple complex relations among various factors, mediators, and the dependent variable. This current research study, in addition, is among few ones that take on this approach, especially in the Vietnamese context. Among important findings, a person’s attitude toward recycling may affect his or her reported recycling behavior. Social norm has also been found to influence recycling behavior indirectly via recycling attitude. Therefore, city governments may consider investing more in public policies that nurture and cultivate the favorable attitude toward recycling behavior.-
dc.formatPortable Document Format (PDF)-
dc.publisherTrường Đại học Kinh tế Tp. Hồ Chí Minh-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Development-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJED, Vol.22(2)-
dc.subjectHousehold recycling behavior-
dc.subjectRecycling attitude-
dc.subjectStructural equation modeling.-
dc.titleDetermining impacts of attitude on household recycling behavior using path analysis: a case study in Can Tho and Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.relation.referenceAfroz,R., Hanaki, K., Tuddin, R., & Ayup, K. (2010). A survey of recyclingbehavior in households in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Waste Management & Research, 28(6), 552–560.-
dc.relation.referenceAjzen,I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-Behavior relations: A theoreticalanalysis and review of empirical research. PsychologicalBulletin, 84(4), 888–918.-
dc.relation.referenceAjzen,I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. OrganizationalBehavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2),179–211.-
dc.relation.referenceBollen,K. (1987). Total, direct, and indirect effects in Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methodology, 17(1), 37–69.-
dc.relation.referenceBrowne,M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A.Bollen & J. S. Long (eds.), Testingstructural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.-
dc.relation.referenceByrne,S., & O’Regan, B. (2014). Attitudes and actions toward recycling behaviorsin the Limerick, Ireland region. Resource,Conservation and Recycling, 87,89–96.-
dc.relation.referenceChaudhry,P., & Ruysschaert, G. (2007). Climatechange and human development in Vietnam. (UNDP Human Development ReportOccasional Paper). Retrieved February 2, 2012 from
dc.relation.referenceChen,F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). Anempirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA Test Statisticsin Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(4), 462–494.-
dc.relation.referenceDalen,H. M., & Halvorsen, B. (2011). Genderdifferences in environment related behavior (Report 38). Oslo, Norway:Statistics Norway. Retrieved December 2, 2014 from
dc.relation.referenceDoValle, P., Rebelo, E., Reis, E., & Menezes, J. (2005). Combining behavioraltheories to predict recycling involvement. Environmentand Behavior, 37(3), 364–396.-
dc.relation.referenceEwing,D. (2001). Altruism, egoistic, and normative effects on curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 33(6), 733–764.-
dc.relation.referenceFerrara,I., & Missios, P. (2012). A cross-country study of household wasteprevention and recycling: Assessing the effectiveness of policy instruments. Land economics, 88(4), 710–744.-
dc.relation.referenceFiorillo,D. (2013). Household waste recycling: National survey evidence from Italy. Journal of Environmental Planning andManagement, 56(8), 1125–1151.-
dc.relation.referenceHalvorsen,B. (2010). Effects of norms and policy incentiveson household recycling – An international comparison (Discussion Paper No.627). Oslo, Norway: Statistics Norway, Research Department.-
dc.relation.referenceHotta,Y., & Aoki-Suzuki, C. (2014). Waste reduction and recycling initiatives inJapanese cities: Lessons from Yokohama and Kamamura. Waste Management & Research, 32(9), 857–866.-
dc.relation.referenceHox,J., & Bechger, T. (2007). An introduction to Structural Equation Modeling. Family Science Review, 11, 354–373.-
dc.relation.referenceKeane,J., Kergna, A., Kennan, J., & Page, S. (2009). Climate change and developing country agriculture: An overview ofexpected impacts, adaptation and mitigation challenges, and fundingrequirements. Geneva, Switzerland:International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, IPC Platform onClimate Change, Agriculture, and Trade.-
dc.relation.referenceLaroche,M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who arewilling to pay more for environmentally friendly products. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503–518.-
dc.relation.referenceLe,A. T. (2012). Ba Ria- Vung Tau runs out of space in its landfill (inVietnamese). Nhan Dan Dien Tu.Retrieved January 23, 2015 from
dc.relation.referenceMiafodzyeva,S., & Brandt, N. (2013). Recycling behavior among householders:Synthesizing determinants via a meta-analysis. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 4(2),221–235.-
dc.relation.referenceMiafodzyeva,S., Brandt, N., & Andersson, M. (2013). Recycling behavior of householdersliving in multicultural urban areas: A case study of Jarva, Stockholm, Sweden. Waste Management & Research, 31(5), 447–457.-
dc.relation.referenceMosler,H. J., & Associates (2008). Deriving interventions on the basis of factorsinfluencing behavioral intentions for waste recycling, composting, and reuse inCuba. Environment and Behavior, 40(4), 522–544.-
dc.relation.referenceNguyen,H. (2014). Factors influencing water saving practices: The case study of Ho ChiMinh City. Vietnam’s Journal EconomicDevelopment, No. 287, 70–89.-
dc.relation.referenceNguyen,T. D. T., & Associates (2007). The effects of local cultural andsocio-economic features on the structure of solid waste management indeveloping country: The case of the Philippines and Vietnam. In Sardinia 2007: Executive summaries.Paper presented at the 11th International Waste Management and LandfillSymposium. Cagliari, Italy: CISA, Environmental Sanitary Engineering Centre.-
dc.relation.referenceNhatLinh (2012). Ho Chi Minh City: Running out of land for landfill in 15 years (inVietnamese). Phap Luat Thanh Pho Ho ChiMinh. Retrieved January 23, 2015 from
dc.relation.referenceNixon,H., & Associates (2009). Understanding preferences for recycling electronicwaste in California: The influence of environmental attitudes and beliefs onwillingness to pay. Environment andBehavior, 41(1), 101–124.-
dc.relation.referencePakpour,A. H., & Associates (2014). Household waste behaviors among a communitysample in Iran: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Waste Management, 34(6), 980–986.-
dc.relation.referencePearl,J. (2012). The causal foundations of Structural Equation Modeling. In R. H.Hoyle (ed.), Handbook of StructuralEquation Modeling (pp. 68–91). New York: Guilford Press.-
dc.relation.referenceRosenzweig,C., & Parry, M. (1994). Potential impact of climate change on world foodsupply. Nature, 367, 133–138.-
dc.relation.referenceSchultz,W., & Oskamp, S. (1996). Effort as a moderator of the attitude-behaviorrelationship: General environmental concern and recycling. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(4),375–383.-
dc.relation.referenceSchwab,N., Harton, H., & Cullum, J. (2014). The effects of emergent norms andattitudes on recycling behavior. Environmentand Behavior, 46(4), 403–422.-
dc.relation.referenceSharma,H., & Associates (2013). Municipal solid waste management in Dessie City,Ethiopia. Management of EnvironmentalQuality: An International Journal, 24(2),154–164.-
dc.relation.referenceSidique,S., Joshi, S., & Lupi, F. (2010). Factors influencing the rate ofrecycling: An analysis of Minnesota counties. Resource, Conservation andRecycling, 54(4), 242–249.-
dc.relation.referenceSterner,T., & Barteling, H. (1999). Household waste management in a Swedishmunicipality: Determinants of waste disposal, recycling and composting. Environmental and Resource Economics, 13(4), 473–491.-
dc.relation.referenceTang,Z., Chen, X., & Luo, J. (2011). Determining socio-psychological drivers forrural household recycling behavior in developing countries: A case study fromWugan, Hunan, China. Environment andBehavior, 43(6), 848–877.-
dc.relation.referenceThanh,N. P., & Matsui, Y. (2011). Municipal solid waste management in Vietnam:Status and the strategic actions. InternationalJournal of Environment and Resources, 5(2),285–296.-
dc.relation.referenceThanh,N. P., Matsui, Y., & Fujiwara, T. (2010). Household solid waste generationand characteristics in a Mekong Delta city, Vietnam. Journal of Environmental Management, No. 91, 2307–2301.-
dc.relation.referenceTheUnited Nations Environment Programme – Regional Resource Center for Asia andthe Pacific (AIT/UNEP RRC.AP). (2010). Municipalwaste management report: Status quo and issues in Southeast and East Asiancountries. Retrieved January 12, 2014 from
dc.relation.referenceTheWorld Bank Group. (2011). Vulnerability, risk reduction, and adaptation toclimate change – Vietnam. Retrieved February 2, 2012 from GFDRRCountryProfiles/wb_gfdrr_climate_change_country_profile_for_VNM.pdf-
dc.relation.referenceTheWorld Bank Group. (2010). Economics ofadaptation to climate change: Vietnam case study. Retrieved February 1,2012 from files/documents/EACC_Vietnam.pdf-
dc.relation.referenceThuHang, & Quang Duan (2011). Ha Noi running out of landfill: Sluggish wastetreatment projects (in Vietnamese). ThanhNien Online, 04/19/2011. Retrieved January 23, 2015 from
dc.relation.referenceTian,G., & Lassa, J. (2015). Get ready for future crisis in food production inSoutheast Asia Asia. The Jakarta Post.Retrieved January 23, 2015 from 01/17/get-ready-future-crisis-food-production-southeast-asia.html-
dc.relation.referenceYi,Y., Hartloff, S., & Meyer, P. (1999). Factors affecting household-levelenvironmental decision making: A three-country comparison of the determinantsof household recycling. Urban Ecosystems,3(2), 146–161.-
dc.relation.referenceZhao,H., & Associates (2013). What affects green consumer behavior in China? Acase study from Qingdao. Journal ofCleaner Production, 63(15),143–151. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.021-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextOnly abstracts-
Appears in Collections:JABES in English
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.