Advanced
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55256
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNguyen Phong Nguyen-
dc.contributor.otherDoan Ngoc Que-
dc.contributor.otherNguyen Dung Hai-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-14T11:02:20Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-14T11:02:20Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn1859 -1124-
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55256-
dc.identifier.urihttp://jabes.ueh.edu.vn/Home/SearchArticle?article_Id=7627dc38-8bea-41c7-9da5-5e6d6a8abf4d-
dc.description.abstractThis study examines cross-functional knowledge sharing at the interface between marketing and accounting departments within business organizations. It develops a coopetition model to examine the effects of contingent variables including cross-functional competition and organizational innovativeness on the coordination–sharing–performance (C–S–P) link. The results obtained from a survey of 178 large firms in Vietnam demonstrate that except formalization all coordination mechanisms including lateral relations, informal networking, and shared visions have positive influences on the knowledge sharing at the interface between marketing and accounting departments. Moreover, competition between these moderates the effects of both lateral relations and informal networking on the extent of knowledge sharing between the marketing and accounting departments (MAKS). Finally, this study finds that organizational innovativeness partially mediates the MAKS–performance link, emphasizing the role of innovation in transforming knowledge to performance.-
dc.formatPortable Document Format (PDF)-
dc.publisherTrường Đại học Kinh tế Tp. Hồ Chí Minh-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Development-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJED, Vol.23(4)-
dc.subjectCoopetition-
dc.subjectKnowledge sharing between marketing and accounting-
dc.subjectOrganizational innovativeness.-
dc.titleKnowledge sharing between marketing and accounting from a coopetitive perspective: empirical evidence from Vietnam-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.relation.referenceAdler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002).Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1),17–40.-
dc.relation.referenceArmstrong, J. S.,& Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.-
dc.relation.referenceBaker, W.,& Sinkula, J. (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation andlearning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 411–427.-
dc.relation.referenceBengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000).\"Cooperation\" in business networks—To cooperate and competesimultaneously. Industrial MarketingManagement, 29(5), 411–426.-
dc.relation.referenceBrettel, M., Heinemann, F., Engelen,A., & Neubauer, S. (2011). Cross-functional integration of R&D,marketing, and manufacturing in radical and incremental product innovations andits effects on project effectiveness and efficiency. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(2), 251–269.-
dc.relation.referenceBurt, R. S. (1995). Structural holes: The social structure ofcompetition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.-
dc.relation.referenceCalantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T.,& Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, andfirm performance. Industrial MarketingManagement, 31(6), 515–524.-
dc.relation.referenceCordon-Pozo, E., Garcia-Morales, V. J.,& Aragon-Correa, J. A. (2006). Inter-departmental collaboration and newproduct development success: A study on the collaboration between marketing andR&D in Spanish high-technology firms. InternationalJournal of Technology Management, 35(1–4),52–79.-
dc.relation.referenceDagnino, G. B. (2009). Coopetitionstrategy: A new kind of interfirm dynamics for value creation. In G. B. Dagnino& E. Rocco (Eds.), Coopetitionstrategy: Theory, experiments and cases (pp. 25–43). NY: Routledge.-
dc.relation.referenceDawes, P. L., &Massey, G. R. (2005). Antecedents of conflict in marketing's cross-functionalrelationship with sales. European Journalof Marketing, 39(11/12),1327–1344.-
dc.relation.referenceErnst, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Rübsaamen,C. (2010). Sales, marketing, and research-and-development cooperation acrossnew product development stages: Implications for success. Journal of Marketing, 74(5),80–92.-
dc.relation.referenceFey, C. F., & Furu, P. (2008). Top management incentive compensationand knowledge sharing in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal,29(12), 1301–1323.-
dc.relation.referenceGhobadi, S., & D'Ambra, J. (2012).Knowledge sharing in cross-functional teams: A coopetitive model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(2),285–301.-
dc.relation.referenceGhoshal, S., Korine,H., & Szulanski, G. (1994). Interunit communication in multinationalcorporations. Management Science, 40(1),96–110.-
dc.relation.referenceGranovetter, M. S. (1973). The strengthof weak ties. American Journal ofSociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.-
dc.relation.referenceGranovetter, M. S. (1985). Economicaction and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3),481–510.-
dc.relation.referenceGriffin, A., & Hauser, J. R.(1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of theliterature. Journal of Product InnovationManagement, 13(3), 191–215.-
dc.relation.referenceGupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V.(2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal,21(4), 473–496.-
dc.relation.referenceHair, J. F., Jr.,Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer onpartial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). CA: Sage Publications.-
dc.relation.referenceHansen, M. T. (1999). Thesearch-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizationsubunits. Administrative ScienceQuarterly, 44(1), 82–111.-
dc.relation.referenceHill, C. W. L. (1990). Cooperation,opportunism, and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 500–513.-
dc.relation.referenceHouston, M. B., Walker, B. A., Hutt, M.D., & Reingen, P. H. (2001). Cross-unit competition for a market charter:The enduring influence of structure. Journalof Marketing, 65(2), 19–34.-
dc.relation.referenceHult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. F., &Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on businessperformance. Industrial MarketingManagement, 33(5), 429–438.-
dc.relation.referenceHutt, M. D., Walker, B. A., &Frankwick, G. L. (1995). Hurdle the cross-functional barriers to strategicchange. Sloan Management Review, 36(3), 22–30.-
dc.relation.referenceInkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K.(2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review,30(1), 146–165.-
dc.relation.referenceJansen, J. J. P., VanDen Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential andrealized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? The Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999–1015.-
dc.relation.referenceKetchen, D. J., Hult, G. T. M., &Slater, S. F. (2007). Toward greater understanding of market orientation andthe resource-based view. StrategicManagement Journal, 28(9),961–964.-
dc.relation.referenceLi, T., & Calantone, R. J. (1998).The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage:Conceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(4),13–29.-
dc.relation.referenceLin, H.-F. (2007). Knowledge sharingand firm innovation capability: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 315–332.-
dc.relation.referenceLuo, X., & Hassan,M. (2009). The role of top management networks for market knowledge creationand sharing in China. Journal of BusinessResearch, 62(10), 1020–1026.-
dc.relation.referenceLuo, X., Slotegraaf, R. J., & Pan,X. (2006). Cross-functional “coopetition”: The simultaneous role of cooperationand competition within firms. Journal ofMarketing, 70(2), 67–80.-
dc.relation.referenceMaltz, E., & Kohli, A. K. (1996).Market intelligence dissemination across functional boundaries. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(1), 47–61.-
dc.relation.referenceMaltz, E., Souder, W. E., & Kumar, A. (2001). InfluencingR&D/marketing integration and the use of market information by R&Dmanagers: Intended and unintended effects of managerial actions. Journal of Business Research, 52(1), 69–82.-
dc.relation.referenceMartinez, J. I., & Jarillo, J. C. (1989). The evolution of researchon coordination mechanisms in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 20(3), 489–514.-
dc.relation.referenceNahapiet, J., &Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and theorganizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2),242–266.-
dc.relation.referenceNarver, J. C., & Slater, S. F.(1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35.-
dc.relation.referenceNguyen, P. N. (2014). The impact of coordination and competitionon cross-functional knowledge sharing and organizational performance. DBAThesis. New South Wales, Australia: Western Sydney University.-
dc.relation.referenceOlavarrieta, S., & Friedmann, R.(2008). Market orientation, knowledge-related resources, and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 61(6), 623–630.-
dc.relation.referencePadula, G., & Dagnino, G. B.(2007). Untangling the rise of coopetition. InternationalStudies of Management and Organization,37(2), 32–52.-
dc.relation.referencePersson, M. (2006).The impact of operational structure, lateral integrative mechanisms, andcontrol mechanisms on intra-MNE knowledge transfer. International Business Review,15(5), 547–569.-
dc.relation.referencePodsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B.,Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioralresearch: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5),879–903.-
dc.relation.referenceQuintana-Garcia, C., &Benavides-Velasco, C. A. (2004). Cooperation, competition, and innovativecapability: A panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms. Technovation, 24(12), 927–938.-
dc.relation.referenceRatnatunga, J., Pike, R., & Hooley,G. J. (1988). The application of management accounting techniques to marketing.Accounting and Business Research, 18(72), 363–370.-
dc.relation.referenceReagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003).Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–267.-
dc.relation.referenceRindfleisch, A., & Moorman, C.(2001). The acquisition and utilization of information in new productalliances: A strength-of-ties perspective. Journalof Marketing, 65(2), 1–18.-
dc.relation.referenceSandvik, I. L., & Sandvik, K.(2003). The impact of market orientation on product innovativeness and businessperformance. International Journal of Researchin Marketing, 20(4), 355–376.-
dc.relation.referenceSidhu, B. K., & Roberts, J. H.(2008). The marketing accounting interface—Lessons and limitations. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(7–8), 669–686.-
dc.relation.referenceTagliaventi, M. R., Bertolotti, F.,& Macrì, D. M. (2010). A perspective on practice in interunit knowledgesharing. European Management Journal, 28(5), 331–345.-
dc.relation.referenceTsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer inintraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptivecapacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal,44(5), 996–1004.-
dc.relation.referenceTsai, W. (2002). Social structure of\"coopetition\" within a multiunit organization: Coordination,competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2),179–190.-
dc.relation.referenceUzzi, B. (1997). Social structure andcompetition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.-
dc.relation.referenceWalley, K. (2007). Coopetition. International Studies of Management andOrganization, 37(2), 11–31.-
dc.relation.referenceWillem, A., &Buelens, M. (2007). Knowledge sharing in public sector organizations: Theeffect of organizational characteristics on interdepartmental knowledgesharing. Journal of Public AdministrationResearch and Theory, 17(4),581–606.-
dc.relation.referenceWillem, A., & Buelens, M. (2009).Knowledge sharing in inter-unit cooperative episodes: The impact oforganizational structure dimensions. InternationalJournal of Information Management, 29(2),151–160.-
dc.relation.referenceWillem, A., Buelens, M., &Scarbrough, H. (2006). The role of inter-unit coordination mechanisms inknowledge sharing: A case study of a British MNC. Journal of Information Science,32(6), 539–561.-
dc.relation.referenceZhang, Y., & Begley, T. M. (2011).Power distance and its moderating impact on empowerment and team participation.The International Journal of HumanResource Management, 22(17),3601–3617.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2016.23.4.02-
dc.format.firstpage138-
dc.format.lastpage159-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextOnly abstracts-
Appears in Collections:JABES in English
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.