Advanced
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/61764
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMalak-Rawlikowska A-
dc.contributor.otherMajewski E.-
dc.contributor.otherWas A.-
dc.contributor.otherBorgen S.O.-
dc.contributor.otherCsillag P.-
dc.contributor.otherDonati M.-
dc.contributor.otherFreeman R.-
dc.contributor.otherHoàng V.-
dc.contributor.otherLecoeur J.-L.-
dc.contributor.otherMancini M.C.-
dc.contributor.otherNguyen A.-
dc.contributor.otherSaïdi M.-
dc.contributor.otherTocco B.-
dc.contributor.otherTörök Á.-
dc.contributor.otherVeneziani M.-
dc.contributor.otherVittersø G.-
dc.contributor.otherWavresky P.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-20T13:42:57Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-20T13:42:57Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050-
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/61764-
dc.description.abstractThe production and distribution of food are among the hot topics debated in the context of sustainable development. Short food supply chains (SFSCs) are now widely believed to be more sustainable in comparison to mass food delivery systems. To date, very little quantitative evidence exists on the impacts of various types of food supply chains. Using a cross-sectional quantitative approach, this study assesses the sustainability of distribution channels in short and long food supply chains based on 208 food producers across seven countries: France, Hungary, Italy, Norway, Poland, the United Kingdom, and Vietnam. Ten distribution channel types are used in this study. To provide a comprehensive sustainability assessment, a set of economic, social, and environmental indicators are applied. Indicators commonly used in the literature are used, supported by original indicators constructed specifically for the present study. In total, 486 chains are examined and the study confirms that individual producers participate simultaneously in several, short and long chains. Participation in SFSCs is beneficial for producers from an economic perspective. SFSCs allow producers to capture a large proportion of margin otherwise absorbed by different intermediaries. It appears, however, that 'longer' supply channels generate lower environmental impacts per unit of production when measured in terms of food miles and carbon footprint. Finally, ambiguous results are found regarding social dimension, with significant differences across types of chains. © 2019 by the authors.en
dc.formatPortable Document Format (PDF)-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMDPI AG-
dc.relation.ispartofSustainability-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol. 11, Issue 15-
dc.rightsThe authors-
dc.subjectEconomicen
dc.subjectImpact assessmenten
dc.subjectIndicatorsen
dc.subjectShort food supply chains (SFSCs)en
dc.subjectSocial and environmental sustainabilityen
dc.titleMeasuring the economic, environmental, and social sustainability of short food supply chainsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su11154004-
ueh.JournalRankingScopus-
item.fulltextOnly abstracts-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATIONS
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.