Advanced
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/78537
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYew Heng Teoh-
dc.contributor.authorWong Yang Han-
dc.contributor.authorHeoy Geok How-
dc.contributor.authorHaseeb Yaqoo-
dc.contributor.authorMohamad Yusof Idroas-
dc.contributor.authorUddin Mahmud-
dc.contributor.authorThanh Danh Le-
dc.contributor.authorMuhammad Ahmad-
dc.contributor.authorMuhammad Wakil Shahzad-
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-29T06:57:28Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-29T06:57:28Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.issn2753-1457-
dc.identifier.urihttps://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/78537-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the optimization of hydrogen production by comparing standard electrolysis with ultrasound-assisted sonoelectrolysis. The catalytic performance of NiO, CoO, and MnO2 was evaluated at operating temperatures of 30 °C, 45 °C, and 60 °C to determine the most effective conditions for maximising H2 production rate and energy efficiency. Using a design of experiments (DOE) framework and response surface methodology (RSM), predictive models were developed and experimentally validated. Sonoelectrolysis achieved a higher production rate (67.2 cm3 h−1) than standard electrolysis (62 cm3 h−1) but with reduced energy efficiency (2.14% vs. 4.37%) due to additional ultrasonic energy demands. For both methods, optimal conditions were consistently found at 60 °C with NiO as the catalyst. Statistical analysis showed that standard electrolysis followed a simple linear model, while sonoelectrolysis required a more complex quadratic model to capture the significant effects of temperature and catalyst type. The regression models were validated with low error rates (0.23–1.10%), providing a quantitative understanding of the performance gains and efficiency trade-offs in sonoelectrolysis, and offering guidance for advancing green hydrogen technologiesen
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherThe Royal Society of Chemistry-
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy Advances-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol. 5, Issue 4-
dc.rightsThe Author(s)-
dc.titleHydrogen production via electrolysis and ultrasound-assisted sonoelectrolysis: evaluating NiO, CoO, and MnO catalyst performance and process efficiencyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1039/d5ya00325c-
dc.format.firstpage505-
dc.format.lastpage517-
ueh.JournalRankingScopus-
item.fulltextOnly abstracts-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATIONS
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.