Advanced
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55169
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMetro travel demand-
dc.contributor.authorNguyen Thanh Son-
dc.contributor.otherNguyen Duy Chinh-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-14T11:02:07Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-14T11:02:07Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn1859 -1124-
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55169-
dc.identifier.urihttp://jabes.ueh.edu.vn/Home/SearchArticle?article_Id=a76fa1f8-238c-4bf9-8071-ce65fc2b8093-
dc.description.abstractBy employing discrete choice experiment with face-to-face survey data of 135 local inhabitants in Ho Chi Minh City, this paper analyzes preference for the urban metro network transportation. The result reveals that seat availability, time, and cost reduction of the trip with metro robustly incite users to utilize this transportation service. Passengers of metro are willing to pay 0.606 and 4.106 thousand VND for one minute reduction of travel time and seat availability on the train cart, respectively. Furthermore, monetary welfare gained for a switch to metro is 64.3 thousand VND for each individual. Some implications regarding ticket prices and policy are also discussed.-
dc.formatPortable Document Format (PDF)-
dc.publisherTrường Đại học Kinh tế Tp. Hồ Chí Minh-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Development-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJED, Vol.24(3)-
dc.subjectDiscrete choice experiment-
dc.subjectUrban transportation mode-
dc.titleTravel demand for metro in Ho Chi Minh City: a discrete choice experiment analysis-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.relation.referenceAdamowicz, W., Louviere, J.,& Williams, M. (1994). Combining revealed and stated preference methods forvaluing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26(3),271–292.-
dc.relation.referenceAhern, A. A., & Tapley, N.(2008). The use of stated preference techniques to model modal choices oninterurban trips in Ireland. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(1),15–27.-
dc.relation.referenceArentze, T. A., & Molin,E. J. (2013). Travelers’ preferences in multimodal networks: Design and resultsof a comprehensive series of choice experiments. TransportationResearch Part A: Policy and Practice, 58, 15–28.-
dc.relation.referenceBateman, I. J., Carson, R. T.,Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., ... & Loomes, G. (2002). Economic valuation with stated preferencetechniques: A manual. Edward Elgar Pub.-
dc.relation.referenceBeuthe, M., & Bouffioux,C. (2008). Analysing qualitative attributes of freight transport from statedorders of preference experiment. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 42(1),105–128.-
dc.relation.referenceBhat, C. R., & Castelar,S. (2002). A unified mixed logit framework for modeling revealed and statedpreferences: Formulation and application to congestion pricing analysis in theSan Francisco Bay area. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 36(7),593–616.-
dc.relation.referenceBrewer, A. M., & Hensher,D. A. (2000). Distributed work and travel behaviour: The dynamics ofinteractive agency choices between employers and employees. Transportation, 27(1),117–148.-
dc.relation.referenceCantillo, V., & de DiosOrtúzar, J. (2005). A semi-compensatory discrete choice model with explicitattribute thresholds of perception. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 39(7), 641–657.-
dc.relation.referenceCherchi, E., & de DiosOrtúzar, J. (2006). On fitting mode specific constants in the presence of newoptions in RP/SP models. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(1), 1–18.-
dc.relation.referencede Palma, A., & Picard, N.(2005). Route choice decision under travel time uncertainty. TransportationResearch Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(4), 295–324.-
dc.relation.referenceEspino, R., Román, C., &de Ortúzar, J. D. (2006). Analysing demand for suburban trips: A mixed RP/SPmodel with latent variables and interaction effects. Transportation, 33(3),241–261.-
dc.relation.referenceGarrod, G. D., Scarpa, R.,& Willis, K. G. (2002). Estimating the benefits of traffic calming onthrough routes: A choice experiment approach. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), 36(2),211–231.-
dc.relation.referenceGeneral Statistics Office of Vietnam. (2013). Report onpopulation variations and family planning survey. Hanoi, Vietnam.-
dc.relation.referenceGreene, W. H., Hensher, D. A.,& Rose, J. (2006). Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance ofunobserved effects in mixed logit models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 40(1),75–92.-
dc.relation.referenceHensher, D. A. (2001).Measurement of the valuation of travel time savings. Journal ofTransport Economics and Policy, 35(1), 71–98.-
dc.relation.referenceHensher, D. A. (2008a).Influence of vehicle occupancy on the valuation of car driver’s travel timesavings: Identifying important behavioural segments. TransportationResearch Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(1), 67–76.-
dc.relation.referenceHensher, D. A. (2008b). Jointestimation of process and outcome in choice experiments and implications forwillingness to pay. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), 42(2),297–322.-
dc.relation.referenceHensher, D. A., & Greene,W. H. (2003). The mixed logit model: The state of practice. Transportation, 30(2),133–176.-
dc.relation.referenceHensher, D. A., & King, J.(2001). Parking demand and responsiveness to supply, pricing and location inthe Sydney central business district. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35(3),177–196.-
dc.relation.referenceHensher, D. A., & Prioni,P. (2002). A service quality index for area-wide contract performanceassessment. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 36(1),93–113.-
dc.relation.referenceHensher, D. A., & Rose, J.M. (2007). Development of commuter and non-commuter mode choice models for theassessment of new public transport infrastructure projects: A case study. TransportationResearch Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(5), 428–443.-
dc.relation.referenceHensher, D. A., Rose, J. M.,& Black, I. (2008). Interactive agency choice in automobile purchasedecisions: The role of negotiation in determining equilibrium choice outcomes. Journal ofTransport Economics and Policy, 42(2), 269–296.-
dc.relation.referenceHensher, D. A., Rose, J. M.,de Dios Ortúzar, J., & Rizzi, L. I. (2009). Estimating the willingness topay and value of risk reduction for car occupants in the road environment. TransportationResearch Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(7), 692–707.-
dc.relation.referenceHess, S., & Rose, J. M.(2009). Allowing for intra-respondent variations in coefficients estimated onrepeated choice data. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 43(6),708–719.-
dc.relation.referenceHo, C. Q., & Yamamoto, T.(2011). The role ofattitudes and public transport service on vehicle ownership in Ho Chi Minh,Vietnam. 34th Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), Adelaide,Australia, 28–30 September 2011.-
dc.relation.referenceHole, A. R. (2007). Acomparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness topay measures. Health Economics, 16(8), 827–840.-
dc.relation.referenceHollander, Y. (2006). Directversus indirect models for the effects of unreliability. TransportationResearch Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(9), 699–711.-
dc.relation.referenceHussain, A., Munn, I. A.,Hudson, D., & West, B. (2010). Attribute-based analysis of hunters’ leasepreferences. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(12), 2565–2571.-
dc.relation.referenceJovicic, G., & Hansen, C.O. (2003). A passenger travel demand model for Copenhagen. TransportationResearch Part A: Policy and Practice, 37(4), 333–349.-
dc.relation.referenceKjær, T. (2005). A review of the discrete choiceexperiment with emphasis on its application in health care. HealthEconomics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.-
dc.relation.referenceLancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approachto consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–157.-
dc.relation.referenceLancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2008). Conducting discretechoice experiments to inform healthcare decision making. Pharmacoeconomics, 26(8), 661–677.-
dc.relation.referenceLeitham, S., McQuaid, R. W.,& Nelson, J. D. (2000). The influence of transport on industrial locationchoice: A stated preference experiment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 34(7),515–535.-
dc.relation.referenceLi, C. Z., & Mattsson, L.(1995). Discrete choice under preference uncertainty: An improved structuralmodel for contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(2),256–269.-
dc.relation.referenceLong, J. S., & Freese, J.(2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variablesusing Stata. Stata press.-
dc.relation.referenceManski, C. F. (1977). The structure of random utility models.Theory and Decision, 8(3),229–254.-
dc.relation.referenceMarschak, J. (1959). Binarychoice constraints on random utility indicators (No. 74). Cowles Foundationfor Research in Economics, Yale University.-
dc.relation.referenceMcDonnell, S., Ferreira, S.,& Convery, F. (2009). Bus priority provision and willingness to paydifferentials resulting from modal choice and residential location: Evidencefrom a stated choice survey. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 43(2),213–235.-
dc.relation.referenceMcFadden, D., & Train, K. (2000). Mixed MNL models fordiscrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics,15(5), 447–470.-
dc.relation.referenceMcFadden, D. (1980). Econometric models for probabilisticchoice among products. The Journal of Business, 53(3), S13–S29.-
dc.relation.referenceMcFadden, D. (1986). The choice theory approach to marketresearch. Marketing Science,5(4), 275–297.-
dc.relation.referenceMcFadden, D. (2001). Economic choices. The AmericanEconomic Review, 91(3), 351–378.-
dc.relation.referenceMcIntosh, E. (2006). Using discrete choice experiments withina cost-benefit analysis framework. Pharmacoeconomics, 24(9), 855–868.-
dc.relation.referenceNguyen, K. P. (1999). Demand,supply, and pricing in urban road transport: The case of Ho Chi Minh City,Vietnam. Research in Transportation Economics, 5, 107–154.-
dc.relation.referenceNguyen, A. T., Zhou, W., &Yu, J. (2015). Study on influencing factors of residents’ travel mode choicefor Ho Chi Minh City. Journal of Science and Technology, 53(4), 503.-
dc.relation.referencePuckett, S. M., & Hensher,D. A. (2009). Revealing the extent of process heterogeneity in choice analysis:An empirical assessment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(2),117–126.-
dc.relation.referencePuckett, S. M., Hensher, D.A., Rose, J. M., & Collins, A. (2007). Design and development of a statedchoice experiment for interdependent agents: Accounting for interactionsbetween buyers and sellers of urban freight services. Transportation, 34(4),429–451.-
dc.relation.referenceRouwendal, J., de Blaeij, A.,Rietveld, P., & Verhoef, E. (2010). The information content of a statedchoice experiment: A new method and its application to the value of astatistical life. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44(1),136–151.-
dc.relation.referenceRungie, C. M., Coote, L. V., & Louviere, J. J. (2011).Structural choice modelling: Theory and applications to combining choiceexperiments. Journal of Choice Modelling,4(3), 1–29.-
dc.relation.referenceSener, I. N., Eluru, N., &Bhat, C. R. (2009). An analysis of bicycle route choice preferences in Texas,US. Transportation, 36(5), 511–539.-
dc.relation.referenceThurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. PsychologicalReview, 34(2), 273–286.-
dc.relation.referenceTrain, K., & Wilson, W. W.(2008). Estimation on stated–preference experiments constructed fromrevealed–preference choices. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 42(3),191–203.-
dc.relation.referenceTrain, K. E. (2009). Discretechoice methods with simulation.Cambridge University Press.-
dc.relation.referenceTseng, Y. Y., & Verhoef,E. T. (2008). Value of time by time of day: A stated–preference study. TransportationResearch Part B: Methodological, 42(7), 607–618.-
dc.relation.referenceTuong, N. T. C. (2014). Determinants of private mode choice in Ho Chi Minh City,Vietnam: From the individual perspective. World transport policy andpractice, 20(1), 56–69.-
dc.relation.referenceVu, T. T. A., & Phuong, D. H. (2013).Combating traffic congestion in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City.Fulbright Economics Teaching Program.-
dc.relation.referenceWang, B., Hensher, D. A.,& Ton, T. (2002). Safety in the road environment: A driver behaviouralresponse perspective. Transportation, 29(3), 253–270.-
dc.relation.referenceWang, D., Borgers, A.,Oppewal, H., & Timmermans, H. (2000). A stated choice approach todeveloping multi–faceted models of activity behavior. TransportationResearch Part A: Policy and Practice, 34(8), 625–643.-
dc.relation.referenceYang, L., Choudhury, C. F.,Ben–Akiva, M., Abreu e Silva, J., & Carvalho, D. (2009). Stated preference survey for new smarttransport modes and services: Design, pilot study and new revision. WorkingPaper ITS-SCUSSE-09-02. Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisbon, Portugal.-
dc.relation.referenceZhang, J., Timmermans, H.,Borgers, A., & Wang, D. (2004). Modeling traveler choice behavior using theconcepts of relative utility and relative interest. TransportationResearch Part B: Methodological, 38(3), 215–234.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.24311/jed/2017.24.3.05-
dc.format.firstpage116-
dc.format.lastpage136-
item.fulltextOnly abstracts-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:JABES in English
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.