Advanced
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55181
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSu Dinh Thanh-
dc.contributor.otherBui Thanh Trung-
dc.contributor.otherTran Trung Kien-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-14T11:02:09Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-14T11:02:09Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn1859 -1124-
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55181-
dc.identifier.urihttp://jabes.ueh.edu.vn/Home/SearchArticle?article_Id=f1f4ca30-68df-444d-b38f-e234eef7631a-
dc.description.abstractVietnam’s taxation system has undergone fundamental reforms since the 1990s. Tax reform program of the 2000–2010 period was conducted successfully, putting in place a tax system appropriate to the market economy and necessary legal conditions for accession to the World Trade Organization and international integration. After over 20 years of tax reform, taxation capacity has been improved; raising tax revenue is comparable to economic and structural potentials of tax system. The Vietnamese Prime Minister ratified a tax system reform strategy for 2010–2020 with ambitious target of tax revenue at 23–24% of GDP. The present study finds that raising tax revenue size is of no benefit to economic growth. Therefore, by 2020, Vietnam will have overcome several challenges in the process of tax reform such as broadening the tax base, simplifying the tax administration according to international standards, and harmonizing tax system grounds between ASEAN members.-
dc.formatPortable Document Format (PDF)-
dc.publisherTrường Đại học Kinh tế Tp. Hồ Chí Minh-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Development-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJED, Vol.22(2)-
dc.subjectTax reform-
dc.subjectInternational integration-
dc.subjectTax competition-
dc.subjectTax harmonization-
dc.titleReforms of tax system in Vietnam in response to International integration commitments until 2020-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.relation.referenceAhmad, E., & Stern, N. (1991). The theory and practice of tax reform indeveloping countries. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.-
dc.relation.referenceAsianDevelopment Bank. (2014). Key Indicatorsfor Asia and the Pacific 2014. Retrieved fromhttp://www.adb.org/publications/key-indicators-asia-and-pacific-2014-
dc.relation.referenceAuerbach, A. (2010). Directions in tax and transfertheory. In Melbourne Institute - Australia's future tax and transfer policyconference (full report) (pp.63–71). Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne Instituteof Applied Economic and Social Research.-
dc.relation.referenceBarro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in across-section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 407–441.-
dc.relation.referenceBird, R. M., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Torgler, B.(2004). Societal institutions and taxeffort in developing countries (International Studies Program Working Paper04-06). Atlanta, Georgia: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia StateUniversity.-
dc.relation.referenceBird, R., & Gendron, P.P.(2007). The VAT in developing andtransitional countries.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UniversityPress.-
dc.relation.referenceBovenberg, L., Cnossen, S., &Mooij, R. D. (2003). Introduction: Taxcoordination in the European UNI0N. International Tax and Public Finance, 10(6), 619–624.-
dc.relation.referenceBrys, B., Matthews, S., Herd, R., & Wang, X.(2013). Tax policy and tax reform in the People'sRepublic of China (OECD TaxationWorking Papers No 18). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.-
dc.relation.referenceBüttner, W., & Associates (2013). Mappingtaxation in selected Asian developing countries. Bonn, Germany: DeutscheGesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit.-
dc.relation.referenceChirathivat, S., & Srisangnam, P. (2013). The2030 architecture of Association of Southeast Asian Nations free tradeagreements (ADBI Working Paper 419). Tokyo, Japan: Asian Development Bank Institute.-
dc.relation.referenceDiamond, P. A., & Mirrlees, J. A. (1971a). Optimaltaxation and public production I: Production efficiency. AmericanEconomic Review,61(1), 8–27.-
dc.relation.referenceDiamond, P. A., & Mirrlees, J. A. (1971b). Optimaltaxation and public production II: Tax rules. American Economic Review,61(3),261–278.-
dc.relation.referenceFox, W. F., & Gurley, T. (2005). An exploration of tax patterns around theworld.Tax Notes International:Special Reports, 37(9), 793–807.-
dc.relation.referenceGiannopoulos,N. (2009, August 5). 101 things to be done before 2020: Tax reform. Borneo Post. Retrieved fromhttp://www.swinburne.edu.my/media/campus_beyond/2009/beyond_details090805.htm-
dc.relation.referenceHarberger, A. C. (1962). The incidence of thecorporation income tax. The Journal of Political Economy, 70(3), 215–240.-
dc.relation.referenceIkhsan, M., Trialdi, L., & Syahrial., S. (2005).Indonesia’s new tax reform: Potential and direction. Journal of AsianEconomics, 16(6),1029–1046.-
dc.relation.referenceJames, S. (2012). Behavioural economics and the risksof tax administration. eJournal of Tax Research, 10(2), 345–363.-
dc.relation.referenceKim, J. (2005). Tax reform issues in Korea. Journalof Asian Economics, 16 , 973–992.-
dc.relation.referenceKing, R. G., & Rebelo, S. (1990). Public policyand economic growth: Developing neoclassical implications. Journal ofPolitical Economics, 98(5),S126–S150.-
dc.relation.referenceKneller, R., Bleaney, M. F., & Gemmell, N. (1999).Fiscal policy and growth: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of PublicEconomics, 74(2), 171–190.-
dc.relation.referenceLe, T. M., Moreno-Dodson, B., &Rojchaichaninthorn, J. (2008). Expanding taxable capacity and reachingrevenue potential: Cross-country analysis. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.-
dc.relation.referenceLin, S. (2004). China’s capital tax reforms in an openeconomy. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32, 128–147 .-
dc.relation.referenceMansor, M., & Tayib, M. (2012). Tax administrationperformance management: Towards an integrated and open system approach. InternationalJournal of Trade, Economics & Finance, 3(2), 136–142.-
dc.relation.referenceMendoza, E. G., Razin, A., &Tesar, L. L. (1994). Effective tax ratesin marcoeconomics: Cross-country estimates of tax rates on factor incomes andconsumption. Journal of Monetary Economics, 34(3), 297–323.-
dc.relation.referenceMendoza, E. G., & Tesar, L. L. (2005). Why hasn'ttax competition triggered a race to the bottom? Some quantitative lessons fromthe EU. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(1), 163–204.-
dc.relation.referenceMirrlees, J., & Associates, (2012). The Mirrleesreview: A proposal for systematic tax reform. National Tax Journal, 65(3), 655–684.-
dc.relation.referenceMitchell, D. J. (2009). The Economics of tax competition - Harmonization vs. liberalization.Adam Smith Institue.Retrieved August 20, 2014 from www.adamsmith.org/sites/default/.../tax-competition.pdf-
dc.relation.referenceRao, M. G. (2000). Tax reform in India: Achievementsand challenges. Asia Pacific Development Journal, 7(2), 59–74.-
dc.relation.referenceRao, M. G. (2005). Tax system reform in India:Achievements and challenges ahead. Journal of Asian Economics, 16(6), 993–1011.-
dc.relation.referenceRodrik, D. (1996). Why do more open economies havebigger governments? (Working Paper 5537). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau ofEconomic Research.-
dc.relation.referenceSujjapongse, S. (2005). Tax policy and reform in Asiancountries: Thailand’s perspective. Journal of Asian Economics, 16(6), 1012–1028.-
dc.relation.referenceSuzuki, M. (2014). Corporate effective tax rates inAsian countries. Japan and the World Economy, 29, 1–17.-
dc.relation.referenceTanzi, V. (2008, February). Theory and practice of tax policy and reform in a globalizing era.Paper presented at the international symposium on Tax Reform in Globalization Era: World Trend and Japan's Choice.Tokyo, Japan.-
dc.relation.referenceThe World Bank Group. (2014). Doing Business Report 2014 Regional Profile: East Asia and the Pacific(EAP). Retrieved from http://www.doingbusiness.org/reports/~/media/GIAWB/ Doing%20Business/Documents/Profiles/Regional/DB2014/DB14-East-Asia-Pacific.pdf-
dc.relation.referenceTosun, M. S., & Sohrab, A. (2005). Economic growthand tax components: An analysis of tax changes in OECD. Applied Economics,37(19), 2251–2263.-
dc.relation.referenceVazquez, J. M. (2011). Taxation in Asia.Manila, the Philippines: Asian Development Bank.-
dc.relation.referenceVelayos, F., Barreix, A., & Villela, L. (2008).Regional integration and tax harmonization: Issues and recent experiences. InV. Tanzi, A. Barreix, & L. Villela (eds.), Taxation and Latin Americanintegration (pp. 79–128). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.-
dc.relation.referenceVietnamese Government. (2004). Decision No. 201/2004/QD-TTg on approving the tax system reform programtill 2010 (in Vietnamese). Retrieved fromhttp://thuvienphapluat.vn/archive/ Quyet-dinh-201-2004-QD-TTg-chuong-trinh-cai-cach-he-thong-thue-den-2010-vb52604.aspx-
dc.relation.referenceVietnamese Government. (2011). Decision No. 732/2011/QD-TTg on approving a 10-year tax system reformstrategy in the 2011-2020 period (in Vietnamese). Retrieved fromhttp://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Thue-Phi-Le-Phi/Quyet-dinh-732-QD-TTg-phe-duyet-Chien-luoc-cai-cach-he-thong-thue-124157.aspx-
dc.relation.referenceWarburton, R., & Hendy, P. (2006). Internationalcomparison of Australia’s taxes. Canberra, Australia: The Treasury.-
dc.relation.referenceWilson, J. D. (1987). Trade, capital mobility, and taxcompetition. Journal of Political Economy, 95(4), 835–856.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.24311/jed/2015.22.2.08-
dc.format.firstpage2-
dc.format.lastpage26-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextOnly abstracts-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
Appears in Collections:JABES in English
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.