Advanced
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55189
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHo Huy Tuu-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-14T11:02:10Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-14T11:02:10Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn1859 -1124-
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55189-
dc.identifier.urihttp://jabes.ueh.edu.vn/Home/SearchArticle?article_Id=a099ff2c-d21f-4332-b91e-12dd11b3e146-
dc.description.abstractThis study tests and discusses the relationships between personality traits in the Big-Five Model and consumers’ choice of luxury attributes (CLA) associated with branded products in Vietnam. A total of 500 adult consumers are interviewed by a self-administrated questionnaire in three cities in Vietnam. Because 33 cases are eliminated for missing values, the data of 467 consumers are employed in this study. Structural equation modeling is also adopted to evaluate the reliability and validity of the constructs and test hypotheses. The results indicate that while extraversion, openness, and agreeableness have significantly positive effects, conscientiousness and neuroticism have significantly negative impacts on the choice of luxury attributes. Thus, Vietnamese consumers with different personality traits have different preferences toward luxury products. The extra value of the paper is to provide deeper insights into how and why each personality trait can link with the choice of luxury attributes. This paper, in addition, particularly stresses that consumers who register in extraversion, openness, and agreeableness are the target audience for luxury branded products in Vietnam.-
dc.formatPortable Document Format (PDF)-
dc.publisherTrường Đại học Kinh tế Tp. Hồ Chí Minh-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Development-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJED, Vol.24(3)-
dc.subjectPersonality traits-
dc.subjectThe choice of luxury attributes-
dc.titleThe relationships between big five personality traits and the choice of luxury product attributes by Vietnamese consumers-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.relation.referenceAmatulli, C., & Guido, G. (2011). Determinantsof purchasing intention for fashion luxury goods in the Italian market: Aladdering approach. Journal of FashionMarketing and Management, 15(1),123–136.-
dc.relation.referenceAnderson, J. C.,& Gerbing, D. W.(1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended twostep approach. Psychological Bulletin,103(3), 411–423.-
dc.relation.referenceBallantyne, R., Warren, A., &Nobbs, K. (2006). The evolution ofbrand choice. Journal of Brand Management, 13(4–5),339–352.-
dc.relation.referenceBerthon, P., Pitt, L., Parent, M.,& Berthon, J. (2009). Aesthetics and ephemerality: Observing and preservingthe luxury brand. California ManagementReview, 52(1), 45–66.-
dc.relation.referenceBickart, B. A. (1993). Carryover andback?re effects in marketing research. Journalof Marketing, 39, 52–62.-
dc.relation.referenceBraun, O. L., & Wicklund, R. A. (1989).Psychological antecedents of conspicuous consumption. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10,161–187.-
dc.relation.referenceBreininge, J. C. (2015). Appetitefor luxury in Vietnam: A lucrative market for high-end products. Vietnam Briefing. Retrieved April16, 2016 fromhttp://www.vietnam-briefing.com/news/appetite-luxury-vietnam-lucrative-market-highend-products.html/-
dc.relation.referenceButt, S., & Phillips, J. G. (2008). Personalityand self-reported mobile phone. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 346–360.-
dc.relation.referenceCasidy, R. (2012). An empirical investigation of therelationship between personality traits, prestige sensitivity, and fashionconsciousness of Generation Y in Australia. AustralasianMarketing Journal, 20(4),242–249.-
dc.relation.referenceCosta, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R.(1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-FactorInventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Psychological AssessmentResources, Odessa, FL.-
dc.relation.referenceCosta, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R.(2008). The revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). In G. Boyle, G.Matthews & D. Saklofske (Eds.). Sagehandbook of personality theory and assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 179–198). SagePublications, Los Angeles, CA.-
dc.relation.referenceDolich, I. J. (1969). Congruence relationships betweenself-images and product brands. Journalof Marketing Research, 6(1),80–84.-
dc.relation.referenceDonnellan, M. B., Frederick, O. L.,Brendan, B. M., & Richard, L. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales:Tiny-yet-effective measures of the big-five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203.-
dc.relation.referenceEastman, J. K., & Eastman, K. L.(2011). Perceptions of status consumption and the economy. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 9(7), 9–20.-
dc.relation.referenceEbay. (2015). How to choose a luxury watch that fits your personality. RetrievedMarch 4, 2016 from http://www.ebay.com/gds/How-to-choose-a-luxury-watch-that-fits-your-personality-/10000000195420640/g.html-
dc.relation.referenceEng, T.-Y., & Bogaert, J. (2010).Psychological and cultural insights into consumption of luxury Western brandsin India. Journal of Customer Behavior,9(1), 55–75.-
dc.relation.referenceFitzmaurice, J., & Comegys, C.(2006). Materialism and social consumption. Journal of Marketing Theory& Practice, 14(4), 287–299.-
dc.relation.referenceFornell, C., & Larcker, D. F.(1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables andmeasurement error. Journal of MarketingResearch, 18(1), 39–50.-
dc.relation.referenceFujiwara, K., & Nagasawa, S.(2015). Relationships among purchaseintentions for luxury brands and personality traits based on the Big Five.American Journal of Industrial andBusiness Management, 5, 631–639.-
dc.relation.referenceGiovannini, S.,Xu, Y., & Thomas, J. (2015).Luxury fashion consumption and Generation Y consumers: Self, brandconsciousness, and consumption motivations. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management,19(1), 22–40.-
dc.relation.referenceGoldberg, L. R.(1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. AmericanPsychologist, 48, 26–34.-
dc.relation.referenceGuido, G., Capestro, M., & Peluso,A. M. (2007). Experimental analysis of consumer stimulation and motivationalstates in shopping experiences. InternationalJournal of Market Research, 49(3),365–386.-
dc.relation.referenceHair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin,B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariatedata analysis (7th Ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.-
dc.relation.referenceHelgeson,J. G., & Supphellen, M. (2004). A conceptual and measurement comparison ofself-congruity and brand personality. InternationalJournal of Market Research, 46(2),205–233.-
dc.relation.referenceHo, V. T., Weingart, L. R., &Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Responses to broken promises: Does personality matter? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(2), 276–293.-
dc.relation.referenceJohnson, M. D. (1989). The differentialprocessing of product category and noncomparable choice alternatives. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 300–309.-
dc.relation.referenceJoshanloo, M., Rastegar, P., & Bakhshi,A. (2012). The Big-Five personality domains as predictors of social wellbeingin Iranian university students. Journalof Social and Personal Relationships, 29(5),639–660.-
dc.relation.referenceKapferer, J.-N., & Bastien, V.(2009). The specificity of luxurymanagement: Turning marketing upside down. Journal of BrandManagement, 16(5–6), 311–322.-
dc.relation.referenceKing, L., Walker, M. L., & Broyles, S. J. (1996).Creativity and the Five-Factor model. Journalof Research in Personality, 30(3),189–203.-
dc.relation.referenceKotler, P. (2000). Marketing management. Millenniumedition, Pearson, Boston, USA.-
dc.relation.referenceLin, L.-J. (2010). The relationship of consumerpersonality trait, brand personality and brand loyalty: An empirical study oftoys and video games buyers. Journal ofProduct & Brand Management, 19(1),4–17.-
dc.relation.referenceMatzler, K., Bidmon, S., &Grabner-Krauter, S. (2006). Individual determinants of brand affect: The roleof the personality traits of extraversion and openness to experience. Journal of Product & Brand Management,15(7), 427–434.-
dc.relation.referenceMcCrae, R. R., &Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. AmericanPsychologist, 52(5), 509–516.-
dc.relation.referenceMiller, K.W., & Mills, M. K. (2012). Contributing clarity by examining brand luxuryin the fashion market. Journal ofBusiness Research, 65(10),1471–1479.-
dc.relation.referenceMonkhouse, L. L., Barnes, B. R., &Stephan, U. (2012). The influence of face and group orientation on theperception of luxury goods: A four market study of East Asian consumers. International Marketing Review, 29(6), 647–672.-
dc.relation.referenceMulyanegara, R. C., & Tsarenko, Y.(2009). Predicting brand choices: An examination of the predictive power ofconsumer personality and values in the Australian fashion market. Journal ofFashion Marketing and Management,13(3), 358–371.-
dc.relation.referenceMooradian, T. A., & Swan, K. S. (2006). Personality-and-culture:The case of national extraversion and word-of-mouth. Journal of Business Research, 59(6),778–785.-
dc.relation.referenceNedungadi, P. (1990). Recall andconsumer consideration sets: Influencing choice without altering brandevaluations. Journal of Consumer Research,17(3), 263–276.-
dc.relation.referenceNguyen, T. T. M., & Tambyah, S. K.(2011). Antecedents and consequences of status consumption among urbanVietnamese consumers. Organizations andMarkets in Emerging Economies, 2(1),75–98.-
dc.relation.referenceNguyen, T. T. M., & Smith, K.(2012). The impact of status orientations on purchase preference for foreignproducts in Vietnam and implications for policy and society. Journal of Macromarketing, 32(1), 52–60.-
dc.relation.referenceNueno, J. L., & Quelch, J. A. (1998). The massmarketing of luxury. Business Horizons, 41(6), 61–68.-
dc.relation.referenceOlsen, S. O.(2002). Comparative evaluation and the relationship between quality,satisfaction, and repurchase loyalty. Journalof the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3),240–249.-
dc.relation.referenceOrth, U. R., Limon, Y., & Rose, G. (2010).Store-evoked affect, personalities, and consumer emotional attachments tobrands. Journal of Business Research,63(11), 1202–1208.-
dc.relation.referencePark, H. J., Rabolt, N. J., & Jeon,K. S. (2008). Purchasing global luxury brands among young Korean consumers. Journal of Fashion Marketing Management,12(2), 244–259.-
dc.relation.referencePaunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big Fivefactors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 524–539.-
dc.relation.referencePervin, L. A. (2006). The Science of Personality (3rd Ed.).Oxford University Press, New York.-
dc.relation.referencePhau, I., & Leng, Y. S. (2008). Attitudes towarddomestic and foreign luxury brand apparel. Journalof Fashion Marketing and Management, 12(1),68–89.-
dc.relation.referencePodsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B.,Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioralresearch: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.-
dc.relation.referenceRank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M.(2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, andinitiative. Applied Psychology: AnInternational Review, 53(4),518–528.-
dc.relation.referenceRichins, M. (1994). Valuing things: Thepublic and private meanings of possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 504–521.-
dc.relation.referenceRothmann, S., & Coetzer, E. P.(2003). The big-five personality dimensions and job performance. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29(1), 68–74.-
dc.relation.referenceShank, M. D., & Langmeyer, L. (1994). Doespersonality in?uence brand image? Journalof Psychology, 128(2), 157–163.-
dc.relation.referenceShukla, P., Singh, J., & Banerjee,M. (2015). They are not all same: Variations in Asian consumers’ valueperceptions of luxury brands. MarketingLetters, 25(3), 265–278.-
dc.relation.referenceTay, M. (2008). Boom in Asia, gloomelsewhere for luxury labels. The StraitsTimes, 18(June), 1–5.-
dc.relation.referenceTsai, S. (2005). Impact of personalorientation on luxury-brand purchase value. International Journal of MarketResearch, 47(4), 429–454.-
dc.relation.referenceTuu, H. H., Olsen, S. O., & Cong,L. C. (2017). Patterns of Vietnamese buyingbehaviors on luxury branded products. AsiaPacific Journal of Marketing & Logistics. Forthcoming.-
dc.relation.referenceTruong, Y., Simmons, G., McColl, R.,& Kitchen, P. J. (2008). Status and conspicuousness: Are they related?Strategic marketing implications for luxury brands. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 16(3),189–203.-
dc.relation.referenceVickers, J. S., & Renand, F.(2003). The marketing of luxury goods: An exploratory study. Marketing Review, 3(4), 459–478.-
dc.relation.referenceVigneron, F., & Johnson, L.W.(2004). Measuring perceptions of brandluxury. The Journal of BrandManagement, 11(6), 484–506.-
dc.relation.referenceZhan, L., & He, Y. (2012). Understanding luxuryconsumption in China: Consumer perceptions of best-known brands. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1452–1460.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.24311/jed/2017.24.3.01-
dc.format.firstpage94-
dc.format.lastpage115-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextOnly abstracts-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
Appears in Collections:JABES in English
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.