Advanced
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55191
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNguyen Thi Canh-
dc.contributor.otherPham Chi Khoa-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-14T11:02:10Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-14T11:02:10Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn1859 -1124-
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55191-
dc.identifier.urihttp://jabes.ueh.edu.vn/Home/SearchArticle?article_Id=51cf3122-ccb0-42e2-ac84-ef17e78d1759-
dc.description.abstractThe research aims to apply KMV-Merton model to calculate and forecast default probability (DP) among corporate customers of Vietcombank. Analyzing data from financial statements of 6,398 corporate customers in the years 2008–2012/2013, the research shows that the DP of the whole customer portfolio is 2.6%, equaling a loss of VND6,319 billion, or 3.8% of outstanding loans to the portfolio. The results also show that small-sized companies have smaller DP as compared to larger ones. Regarding industries, the lowest DP is found in road and waterway transport business, and the highest is in electricity (including production, transmission and distribution), production of other kinds of power, and seafood processing business. Industries with high DP and outstanding loans may cause the greatest damage to banks. The research concludes that large-sized companies and seafood processing enterprises cause the greatest losses to banks.-
dc.formatPortable Document Format (PDF)-
dc.publisherTrường Đại học Kinh tế Tp. Hồ Chí Minh-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Development-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJED, Vol.22(1)-
dc.subjectKMV model-
dc.subjectDefault point-
dc.subjectDistance to default-
dc.subjectDefault probability-
dc.subjectExtent of loss-
dc.subjectCorporate customers-
dc.titleAn application of KMV model to forecast the credit risk of corporate customers and bank’s expected losses-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.relation.referenceCampion, M., Medsker, G.,& Higgs, A. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics andeffectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology,46, 823-850.-
dc.relation.referenceChu, H.-C., & Hwang,G.-J. (2007). A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with thecooperation of multiple experts. ExpertSystems with Applications, 34(4), 2826-2840.-
dc.relation.referenceKatzenbach, J., & Smith, D. (2007). The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review,71(2),111-120.-
dc.relation.referenceNguyen, H. L. (2007). Organizational behavior (in Vietnamese). HCMC, Vietnam: Thong Ke Publisher-
dc.relation.referenceNguyen, H. L. (2013). Course-book of organizational developmentand change: Team and work diagnosis (in Vietnamese). HCMC, Vietnam:University of Economics HCMC – CEMD-
dc.relation.referenceNguyen, T.T.N. (2013). Finnish and Vietnamese teams: How to improveinternational teamwork and management practices through cooperation.(Unpublished bachelor’s thesis). Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu (JAMKUniversity of Applied Sciences),Finland.-
dc.relation.referenceNunnally, J., &Burnstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory,(3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.-
dc.relation.referenceTruong, Q., Swierczek, F.W.,& Dang, T.K.C. (1998). Effective leadership in joint ventures in Vietnam: Across-cultural perspective. Journal ofOrganizational Change Management, 11(4), 357-372.-
dc.relation.referenceRasker, P., van Vliet, T.,van Den Broek, H., & Essens, P. (2001). Teameffectiveness factors: A literature review (TNO Technical ReportTM-01-B007),Soesterberg, TheNetherlands.-
dc.relation.referenceRobbins, S., & Judge, T.(2008). Essentials of organizationalbehavior (9th ed.). Upper SaddleRiver, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.-
dc.relation.referenceRobbins, S., & Judge, T.(2012), Organizational behavior (15thed.).Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.-
dc.relation.referenceSaigonGround Services– SAGS. (2010). A Discourse on teamwork(in Vietnamese). Private trainingmanual. HCMC, Vietnam: Saigon GroundServices Company Ltd.-
dc.relation.referenceSalas, E., Dickinson, T.,Converse, S., & Tannenbaum, S. (1992). Toward an understanding of teamperformance and training. In R. W.Swezey, & E. Salas(Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance(pp. 3-29), NJ: Ablex.-
dc.relation.referenceSisson, J. (2013). Thedifference between a group and a team. TheBusiness Journals. Retrieved March 16, 2012 fromhttp://www.bizjournals.com/bizjournals/how-to/growth-strategies/2013/06/the-difference-between-a-group-and-a.html.-
dc.relation.referenceSteven, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for thesocial sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.-
dc.relation.referenceSundstrom, E. &Associates. (1998). Supporting work teameffectiveness: Best management practicesfor fostering high performance, San Francisco: Jossey-BassPublishers.-
dc.relation.referenceTalentInstitute. (n.d.). The journey to teameffectiveness, Richards Bay - South Africa, Dubai - United Arab Emirates.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.24311/jed/2015.22.1.07-
dc.format.firstpage62-
dc.format.lastpage81-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextOnly abstracts-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
Appears in Collections:JABES in English
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.