Advanced
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55207
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNguyen Thi Hong Vinh-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-14T11:02:12Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-14T11:02:12Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn1859 -1124-
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55207-
dc.identifier.urihttp://jabes.ueh.edu.vn/Home/SearchArticle?article_Id=963c8419-022f-44f2-ac78-2b0bcb209023-
dc.description.abstractThe paper aims at exploring the relationship between bad debt and cost efficiency in Vietnamese commercial banks in the years 2007 – 2013. The research includes two stages: (i) Measuring the cost efficiency of banks by non-parameter Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method suggested by Coelli (2005)-
dc.formatPortable Document Format (PDF)-
dc.publisherTrường Đại học Kinh tế Tp. Hồ Chí Minh-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Development-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJED, Vol.22(1)-
dc.subjectBad debts-
dc.subjectCost efficiency-
dc.subjectTobit-
dc.subjectVietnamese commercial banks-
dc.titleBad debt and cost efficiency in Vietnamese commercial banks-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.relation.referenceAltunbas, Y.,Liu, M. H., Molyneux, P., & Seth, R. (2000). Efficiency and risk inJapanese banking. Journal of Banking andFinance, 24(10), 1605-1628.-
dc.relation.referenceBerger, A. N.,& DeYoung, R. (1997). Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercialbanks. Journal of Banking and Finance,21, 849-870.-
dc.relation.referenceBerger, A. N.,& Humphrey, D. B. (1992). Measurement and efficiency issues in commercialbanking. In Z. Griliches(Ed.), Output measurement in the services sectors(pp. 245-279). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.-
dc.relation.referenceCoelli, J.T.,Rao, D.S.P., O’Donnell, C.J., & Battese, G.E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, New York:Spinger Science + Business Media, Inc.-
dc.relation.referenceDeYoung, R.(1998). Management quality and X-efficiency in national banks. Journal of Financial Services Research, 13(1), 5-22.-
dc.relation.referenceFan, L., &Shaffer, S. (2004). Efficiency versus risk in large domestic US banks. Managerial Finance, 30(9), 1-19.-
dc.relation.referenceGirardone, C.,Molyneux, P., & Gardener, E. P. (2004). Analysing the determinants of bankefficiency: The case of Italian banks. AppliedEconomics, 36(3), 215-227.-
dc.relation.referenceHughes, J. P.,& Mester, L. J. (1993). A quality and risk-adjusted cost function forbanks: Evidence on the ‘Too-big-to-fail’ doctrine. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 4, 293-315.-
dc.relation.referenceKarim, M. Z.A. (2001). Comparative bank efficiency across select ASEAN countries. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 18(3), 289-304.-
dc.relation.referenceKarim, M. Z.A., Chan, S.G., & Hassan, S. (2010). Bank efficiency and non-performingloans: Evidence from Malaysia and Singapore. Prague Economic Papers, 2,118-132.-
dc.relation.referenceKoutsomanoli-Fillipaki,A., & Mamatzakis, E. (2009). Performance and Merton-type default risk oflisted banks in the EU: A panel VAR approach. Journal of Banking and Finance,33(11),2050-2061.-
dc.relation.referenceNguyen, T.H.V.(2012). Measuring the technical effectiveness and Malmquist index of theVietnam commercial banks (in Vietnamese). BankingTechnology Review, 74, 16-23.-
dc.relation.referencePeristiani, S.(1996). Evaluating the post mergerX-efficiency and scale efficiency of U.S. banks (Working paper) New York:Federal Reserve Bank of New York.-
dc.relation.referenceRossi, S. P. S.,Schwaiger, M. S., & Winkler, G. (2009). How loan portfolio diversificationaffects risk, efficiency and capitalization: A managerial behavior model forAustrian banks. Journal of Banking andFinance, 33(12), 2218-2226.-
dc.relation.referenceState Bank of Vietnam.(2014). Monetary-banking statistics(in Vietnamese). Retrieved March 31, 2014, from http://sbv.gov.vn/portal/faces/vi/vim/vipages_trangchu/tkttnh/hdhttctd/tlnx?_adf.ctrl-state=14f3bh0o7d_4&_afrLoop=6525861870900800.-
dc.relation.referenceStaub, R. B.,da Silva e Souza, G., & Tabak, B. M. (2010). Evolution ofbank efficiency in Brazil: A DEA approach. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research, 202(1), 204-213.-
dc.relation.referenceTobin, J.(1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26(1), 24-36.-
dc.relation.referenceTsai, D. H.,& Huang, F. W. (1999). Management quality and bank efficiency: Empiricalevidence for Taiwanese banks. ManagementReview, 18(3), 35-55.-
dc.relation.referenceWheelock, D. C., & Wilson, P. W. (1995).Explaining bank failures: Deposit insurance, regulation, and efficiency. Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 689-700.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.24311/jed/2015.22.1.01-
dc.format.firstpage125-
dc.format.lastpage140-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextOnly abstracts-
Appears in Collections:JABES in English
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.