Advanced
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55211
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuỳnh Thị Thu Thanh-
dc.contributor.otherCao Hao Thi-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-14T11:02:13Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-14T11:02:13Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn1859 -1124-
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55211-
dc.identifier.urihttp://jabes.ueh.edu.vn/Home/SearchArticle?article_Id=71c68a28-67c4-4a90-ae02-18baafb7d2db-
dc.description.abstractOrganizational change is inevitable for survival and growth in the current dynamic business environment. Under the pressure of external and internal environments such as economic policies, behaviors of competitors, visions of companies, mergers, acquisitions, etc. every organization is forced to change. However, organizational change does not always bring expected results for all organizations. The most common reason for the failure of organizational change is the employees’ resistance to change. This study aims at evaluating factors that affect acceptance, resistance and resignation among employees when organizational change takes place. The results showed that employees’ commitment to and trust in organization have positive effects whereas perception of status loss has negative effects on acceptance of organizational change. On the other hand, commitment and trust of employees with organization have negative effects whereas workplace stress has positive impacts on the resistance to organizational change. Additionally, employees with resistance to changes tend to quit their jobs. Goodness of fit of the general model based on path analysis is 64.6%.-
dc.formatPortable Document Format (PDF)-
dc.publisherTrường Đại học Kinh tế Tp. Hồ Chí Minh-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Development-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJED, No. 219-
dc.subjectInfluential factors-
dc.subjectOrganizational change-
dc.subjectAttitudes toward organizational changes-
dc.subjectResignation tendency-
dc.titleFactors affecting employees’ attitudes and tendency to resign caused by organizational change-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.relation.referenceAppelbaum,S.H., N. St-Pierre & W. Glavas (1998), “Strategic Organizational Change:The Role of Leadership, Learning, Motivation and Productivity”, Management Decision, Vol. 36(5), pp.289-301.-
dc.relation.referenceArmenakis,A.A., S.G. Harris & K.W. Mossholder (1993), “Creating Readiness forOrganizational Change”, Human Relations,Vol. 46(6), pp. 681-703.-
dc.relation.referenceBeer, M. &N. Nohria (2000), “Cracking the Code of Change”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 78(2), pp. 133-141.-
dc.relation.referenceCallan, V.J.(1993), “Individual and Organizational Strategies for Coping withOrganizational Change”, Work &Stress, Vol. 7(1), pp. 63-75.-
dc.relation.referenceDeluga, R.J.(1994), “Supervisor Trust Building, Leader-Member Exchange and OrganizationalCitizenship Behavior”, Journal ofOccupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 67(4), pp.315-326.-
dc.relation.referenceFay, D. &H. Lührmann (2004), “Current Themes in Organizational Change”, European Journal of Work and OrganizationalPsychology, Vol. 13(2), pp.113-119.-
dc.relation.referenceGeorge, J.M.& G.R. Jones (2002), Understandingand Managing Organizational Behavior (3rd ed.), Pearson PrenticeHall, New Jersey.-
dc.relation.referenceHuber, G.P.& A.H. Van de Ven (1995), LongitudinalField Research Methods: Studying Processes of Organizational Change(Organization Science), SAGE Publications, pp. 126-154.-
dc.relation.referenceJimmieson,N.L., D.J. Terry & V.J. Callan (2004), “A Longitudinal Study of EmployeeAdaptation to Organizational Change: The Role of Change-Related Information andChange-Related Self-Efficacy”, Journal ofOccupational Health Psychology, Vol. 9(1), pp. 11-27-
dc.relation.referenceKotter, J.P.& D.S. Cohen (2002), The Heart ofChange: Real-life Stories of How People Change Their Organizations, HarvardBusiness Review Press.-
dc.relation.referenceLau, C.M.& R.W. Woodman (1995), “Understanding Organizational Change: A SchematicPerspective”, The Academy of ManagementJournal, Vol. 38(2), pp. 537-554.-
dc.relation.referenceLevy, A.(1986), “Second-order Planned Change: Definition and Conceptualization”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol.15,pp.5-20.-
dc.relation.referenceLin, Nan-Hong& Chiang Yu-Han (2005), “A Study of Relationship between OrganizationalChange Perceptions and Turnover Intention in the Financial Industry – TheMediating Effects of Job Satisfaction and Job Stress”.-
dc.relation.referenceNguyễn ThịBích Đào (2009), “Quản lý những thay đổi trong tổ chức”, Tạp chí Khoa học ĐHQGHN, Vol. 25(3), pp.159-166.-
dc.relation.referencePedhazur, E.J.(1982), Multiple Regression in BehavioralResearch (2nd ed.), Harcourt College Publishers.-
dc.relation.referenceRafferty, A.E.& M.A., Griffin (2006). “Perceptions of Organizational Change: A Stress andCoping Perspective”, Journal of AppliedPsychology, Vol. 91(5), pp.1154-1162.-
dc.relation.referenceVakola, M.& I. Nikolaou (2005), “Attitudes Towards Organizational Change: What is theRole of Employees' Stress and Commitment?” EmployeeRelations, Vol. 27, pp. 160-174.-
dc.relation.referenceVos, J.(2006), The Role of Personality andEmotions in Employee Resistance to Change (Master’s Thesis), ErasmusUniversity Rotterdam.-
dc.relation.referenceYu, Ming-Chu(2009), “Employees' Perception of Organizational Change: The Mediating Effectsof Stress Management Strategies”, PublicPersonnel Management, Vol. 38(1), pp. 17-32.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.24311/jed/2014.219.1.01-
dc.format.firstpage144-
dc.format.lastpage160-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextOnly abstracts-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
Appears in Collections:JABES in English
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.