Advanced
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55219
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDoan Thi Hong Van-
dc.contributor.otherBui Nhat Le Uyen-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-14T11:02:15Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-14T11:02:15Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn1859 -1124-
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55219-
dc.identifier.urihttp://jabes.ueh.edu.vn/Home/SearchArticle?article_Id=eb0958a4-2029-4b9d-9881-233712682642-
dc.description.abstractNumerous studies have demonstrated that the success of businesses in the era of knowledge-based economy depends on their innovation capacity (Azevedo et al., 2007). Therefore, the main goal of this study is to explore the factors that impact the innovation capacity of enterprises in the Vietnam Southern high tech industry. Besides the qualitative method, the study carries out a survey of 380 enterprises in the fields of electronics, microelectronics, information technology, telecommunications, precision engineering, automation, biotechnology, and nanotechnology. The results reveal that total quality management, internal human resources, absorptive capacity, government support, and collaboration networks impact positively on the innovation capacity. In addition, the research proposes solutions for high tech enterprises to boost their innovation capacity in the future.-
dc.formatPortable Document Format (PDF)-
dc.publisherTrường Đại học Kinh tế Tp. Hồ Chí Minh-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Development-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJED, Vol.24(3)-
dc.subjectInnovation-
dc.subjectTotal quality management-
dc.subjectHuman resources-
dc.subjectAbsorbtive capacity-
dc.subjectCollaboration networks-
dc.subjectHigh tech industry-
dc.titleFactors affecting innovation capacity in Vietnamese Southern high technology industries-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.relation.referenceAlpkan, L.,Bulut, C., Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., & Kilic, K. (2010). Organizational support for intrapreneurshipand its interaction with human capital to enhance innovative performance. ManagementDecision,48(5), 732–755.-
dc.relation.referenceAlmus, M., &Czarnitzki, D. (2003). The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms’innovationactivities: The case of Eastern Germany. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics,21, 226–236.-
dc.relation.referenceAnker, L. V. (2006). Absorptivecapacity and innovative performance: A human capital approach. Economics ofInnovation and New Technology, 15(4–5), 507–517.-
dc.relation.referenceArgyris, C.,& Schon,D.A.(1978). Organizational learning: A theory ofaction perspective. Addison-Wesley, MA.-
dc.relation.referenceArmbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel,S., & Lay, G. (2008). Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuringnon-technical innovation in large-scale surveys. Technovation, 28(10), 644–657.-
dc.relation.referenceAzevedo, F.(2007). An attempt to dynamically break symmetries in thesocial golfers problem. In Azevedo etal. (Eds.),Recent advances in constraints (pp. 33–47). LNAI 4651, Springer.-
dc.relation.referenceBantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E.(1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of thetop team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 107–124.-
dc.relation.referenceBarrow, J. W. (1993). Does totalquality management equal organizational learning? Quality Progress, 26(7), 39–43.-
dc.relation.referenceBaum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., &Silverman, B. S. (2000). Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition andstartup’s performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic ManagementJournal,21, 267–294.-
dc.relation.referenceBelussi, F.,Sammarra, A., & Sedita, S.R. (2010). Learning at the boundaries in an ‘‘open regional innovation system’’:A focus on firms’ innovation strategies in the EmiliaRomagna life science industry. Research Policy, 39, 710–721.-
dc.relation.referenceBeugelsdijk, S.,& Cornet, M. (2002). A far friend is worth more than a good neighbor: Proximity and innovation in a small country. Journalof Management and Governance,6, 169–188.-
dc.relation.referenceBlock, F., &Keller, M.R.(2008). Where do innovations come from?Transformations in the U.S. National Innovation System, 1970–2006. Report by the InformationTechnology and Innovation Foundation.-
dc.relation.referenceBontis, N.,Crossan, M., & Hulland, J. (2002). Managing an organizational learning system by aligningstocks and flows. Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 437–469.-
dc.relation.referenceBolwijn, P.T.,& Kumpe, T.(1990). Manufacturing in the 1990s: Productivity, flexibility and innovation. Long Range Planning, 23(4), 44–57.-
dc.relation.referenceBransetter, L.G., &Sakakibara, M.(2002). Whendo research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data. AmericanEconomic Review,92, 143–159.-
dc.relation.referenceChen, H.,& Taylor, R.(2009). Exploring the impact of lean management oninnovation capability. PICMET 2009 Proceedings August 2–6. Portland, OR.-
dc.relation.referenceConner, K., & Prahalad, C. K.(1996). Aresource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. OrganizationScience, 7(5), 477–501.-
dc.relation.referenceCohen, W.M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. AdministrativeScience Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.-
dc.relation.referenceCzarnitzki, D., Ebersberger,B.,& Fier, A. (2007). Therelationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany. Journalof Applied Econometrics,22, 1347–1366.-
dc.relation.referenceDakhli, M., &de Clercq, D.(2004). Human capital, social capital and innovation: Amulti-country study. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16, 107–128.-
dc.relation.referenceDavenport, T.H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Workingknowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business SchoolPress, Boston.-
dc.relation.referenceDean, J.W., & Evans, J.R. (1994). Totalquality management, organization, and strategy. West PublishingCompany, Minneapolis/St Paul.-
dc.relation.referenceDieu Minh.(2010). Necessity of formulating policies on technology innovation for industrysector enterprises (in Vietnamese). Science& Technology Policy Research, 17, 61–72.-
dc.relation.referenceDosi, G. (1988). Sources,procedure, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of EconomicLiterature, 24, 1120–1171.-
dc.relation.referenceEgan, T. M.,Yang, B., & Bartlett, K. (2004). The effects of learning culture andjob satisfaction on motivation to transfer learning and intention to turnover. HumanResource Development Quarterly, 15(3),279–301.-
dc.relation.referenceEllinger, A.D., Ellinger, A. E., Yang, B., & Howto, S. W.(2002). The relationship between the learningorganization concept and firms’ financial performance: An empirical assessment.Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(1), 5–21.-
dc.relation.referenceFeldman, M.P.,& Kelley, M.R.(2006). The ex ante assessment of knowledgespillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior. ResearchPolicy,35, 1509–1521.-
dc.relation.referenceGellynck, X., Vermeire, B., & Viaene, J.(2007). Innovation in food firms: Contribution of regional networks withinthe international business context. Entrepreneurship & RegionalDevelopment, 19(3), 209–226.-
dc.relation.referenceGeroski, P. A. (1994). Marketstructure, corporate performance and innovative activity. Clarendon Press,Oxford.-
dc.relation.referenceGeorge, G.,Zahra, S.A., & Wood, D.R.(2002). The effects of business-university alliances oninnovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnologycompanies. Journal of Business Venturing,17, 577–609.-
dc.relation.referenceGiuliani, E., & Bell, M.(2005). The micro-determinants of meso-level learning andinnovation: Evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy, 34(1), 47–68.-
dc.relation.referenceGoldman, A. (1982). Short product life cycle:Implications for marketing activities in small high tech companies. R and D Management, 12(2), 9–81.-
dc.relation.referenceGustafson,D. H., & Hundt, A. S. (1995). Findings of innovation research applied toquality management principles for health care. Health Care Management Review,20(2), 16–34.-
dc.relation.referenceHagedoorn, J.(1993). Understanding the rationale ofstrategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoraldifferences. Strategic Management Journal,14, 371–385.-
dc.relation.referenceHamel, G., & Pralahad,C. K. (1994). Competing for the future.Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge.-
dc.relation.referenceHayton, J. C., & Kelley, D. J.(2006). A competency-based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship. HumanResource Management, 45(3), 407–427.-
dc.relation.referenceHiggins, J. M. (1995). Innovation: The core competence. Planning Review,Nov/Dec, 32–35.-
dc.relation.referenceHirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2008).Low-tech innovations. Industry and Innovation,15(1), 19–43.-
dc.relation.referenceHung, R.Y.Y.,Lien, B.Y.H., Yang,B., Wu, C.M., & Kuo, Y.M. (2010). Impact of TQMand organizational learning on innovation performance in the high-techindustry. International Business Review, 20, 213–225.-
dc.relation.referenceJantunen, A. (2005). Knowledge-processingcapabilities and innovative performance: An empirical study. European Journalof Innovation Management, 8(3),336–349.-
dc.relation.referenceJuran, J. M. (1988). Juran onplanning for quality. The Free Press, New York, NY.-
dc.relation.referenceLawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001).Developing innovation capability in organisations: A dynamic capabilitiesapproach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 377–400.-
dc.relation.referenceLee, L., & Wong, P. K. (2009). Firm’innovative performance: The mediating role of innovative collaborations.MPRA Paper No. 16193. Munich Personal RePEc Archive.-
dc.relation.referenceLichtenthaler, U. (2009).Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and thecomplementarity of organizational learning processes. Academy ofManagement Review, 52(4), 822–846.-
dc.relation.referenceLiu, X.,& Buck, T.(2007).Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers:Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries. Research Policy, 36, 355–366.-
dc.relation.referenceNelson, R., &Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economicchange. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.-
dc.relation.referenceNonaka, I., &Takeuchi, H. (1995). Theknowledge creating company.Oxford University Press, New York.-
dc.relation.referenceNystrom, H. (1990). Technological and market innovation: Strategiesfor product and company development.John Wileyand Sons, Chichester, UK.-
dc.relation.referenceKanji, G. K. (1996). Can total quality management help innovation?. TotalQuality Management, 7(1), 3–9.-
dc.relation.referenceKang, K.N.,& Park, H.(2011).Influence of government R&D support and inter-firm collaborations oninnovation in Korean biotechnology SMEs. Technovation, 32, 68–78.-
dc.relation.referenceMcAdam, R.,& Armstrong, G. (2001). Asymbiosis of quality and innovation in SMEs: A multiple case study analysis.Managerial AuditingJournal, 16(7), 394–399.-
dc.relation.referenceMacInnis, M., & Heslop, L. A. (1990). Marketingplanning in high tech environment. IndustrialMarketing Management, 19, 160–170.-
dc.relation.referenceMahesh, C. (1993). Total quality management in managementdevelopment.Journal of Management Development, 12(7), 19–31.-
dc.relation.referenceMansfield, E.(1983).Technological change and market structure: An empirical study.The American EconomicReview, 73(2), 205–211.-
dc.relation.referenceMartinez-Costa, M., & Jimenez-Jimenez, D. (2008). Are companiesthat implement TQM better learning organizations? An empirical study.Total QualityManagement, 19(11), 1101–1115.-
dc.relation.referenceMohrman, S.A.,&Von Glinow, M.A. (1998). Hightechnology organizations: Asynthesis.InM.A. VonGlinow & S.A.Mohrman (Eds.), Managingcomplexity in high technology organizations. Oxford University Press, New York.-
dc.relation.referenceNiosi, J., Saviotti, P., Bellon, B., & Crow, M.(1993).National systems of innovation: In search of a workable concept. Technologyin Society, 15.-
dc.relation.referenceOerlemans, L. A. G., & Meeus, M. T. H. (2005). Doorganizational and spatial proximity impact on firm performance?Regional Studies, 39(1), 89–104.-
dc.relation.referenceOECD. (1997b). Oslomanual: Proposedguidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data (2nd Ed.).Paris.-
dc.relation.referencePapaconstantinou, G. (1997). Technology and industrial performance. The OECDObserver, 204, 6–10.-
dc.relation.referencePark, C. (2006). Studies on value-chain basedinnovation system: Evidence from the intermediate goodsindustry in Korea (PhD Dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul.-
dc.relation.referencePetrauskaite,N. (2009). Public sector, industry and academicpublic networking for high technology development. Science – Future ofLITHUANIA,1(3), 51–54.-
dc.relation.referencePrajogo, D.I.,& Ahmed, P.K.(2006).Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovationcapacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management, 36(5), 499–515.-
dc.relation.referencePrajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2003). The relationship between TQMpractices, quality performance, and innovation performance. TheInternational Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(8), 901–918.-
dc.relation.referenceRiggs, H. E. (1983). Managing high technology companies. Belmont, CA.-
dc.relation.referenceRitter, T., & Gemunden, H. G.(2003). Networkcompetence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedent. Journal of BusinessResearch, 56,745–755.-
dc.relation.referenceRhodes, J., Hung, R., Lok, P., Lien, B., & Wu, C. (2008). Factors influencing organizationalknowledge transfer: Implication for corporate performance. Journal ofKnowledge Management, 12(3), 84–100.-
dc.relation.referenceRomijn, H.,& Albaladejo, M.(2002).Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firmsin southeast England. Research Policy,31, 1053–1067.-
dc.relation.referenceRoffe, I. (1999). Innovation andcreativity in organisations: Areview of the implications for training and development. Journal of EuropeanIndustrial Training,23(4–5),224–237.-
dc.relation.referenceRothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system ofnew product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 201–221.-
dc.relation.referenceRoy, S., Sivakumar, K., & Wilkinson, I.F.(2004).Innovation generation in supply chain relationships: A conceptual model and researchpropositions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 61–79.-
dc.relation.referenceSchumpeter, J. A. (1911). The theory of economic development. Duncker& Humblot, Leipzig.-
dc.relation.referenceShan, W., Walker, G., & Kogut, B. (1994). Interfirm cooperation and start up innovation in thebiotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal,15,387–394.-
dc.relation.referenceShanklin, W. L., & Ryans, J.K.Jr.(1984). Marketing high technology. Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.-
dc.relation.referenceSouitaris, V. (2002). Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-leveldeterminants of innovation. Research Policy,31, 877–898.-
dc.relation.referenceSuarez-Villa, L.(1990). Invention, inventive learning and innovative capacity. Behavioral Science, 35(4), 290–310.-
dc.relation.referenceSzeto, E.(2000).Innovation capacity: Workingtowards a mechanism for improving innovation within an inter-organizationalnetwork. The TQM Magazine, 12(2),149–158.-
dc.relation.referenceTang, H. K.(1998). An integrative model of innovation in organizations. Technovation,18(5), 297–309.-
dc.relation.referenceTether, B.S.(2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why? An empirical analysis. Research Policy,31, 947–967.-
dc.relation.referenceTidd, J.,Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Managing innovation: Integratingtechnological, market, and organizational change. Wiley, Chichester.-
dc.relation.referenceTomlinson, P.R.(2010). Co-operative ties and innovation: Some newevidence for UK manufacturing. Research Policy,39, 762–775.-
dc.relation.referenceWang, X., Yang,B., & McLean, G. N. (2007). Influence of demographic factors and ownershiptype upon organizational learning culture in Chinese enterprises. InternationalJournal of Training and Development, 11(3),154–165.-
dc.relation.referenceWallsten, S. J.(2000). The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D:The case of the small business innovation research program. RAND Journal ofEconomics,31, 82–100.-
dc.relation.referenceWatkins, K. E.,& Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons inthe art and science of systemic change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.24311/jed/2017.24.3.04-
dc.format.firstpage66-
dc.format.lastpage93-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextOnly abstracts-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:JABES in English
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.