Advanced
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55274
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHo Quoc Thong-
dc.contributor.otherTuyet Hoa Niekdam-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-14T11:02:25Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-14T11:02:25Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn1859 -1124-
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55274-
dc.identifier.urihttp://jabes.ueh.edu.vn/Home/SearchArticle?article_Id=3d33b1b7-ac74-4ef0-9480-7964a96fa6df-
dc.description.abstractVietnam coffee sector plays a crucial role not only in the country’s economy but also in the global coffee market, and improving coffee production efficiency may benefit coffee producers. However, small-holder coffee farming households still encounter many difficulties regarding resources and socio-economic conditions affecting coffee production efficiency. This study examines relationships among income diversification, rural credit loan, labor dependence, and technical efficiency in coffee production through a face-to-face survey with participation of 143 coffee farming households conducted in Cu M’gar District, Dak Lak Province, Vietnam. The stochastic frontier model shows that the mean of technical efficiency scores is 0.64, and it also verifies the existence of inefficiency variation. Both Maximum Likelihood Estimate (MLE) and Feasible Generalized Least Square (FGLS) consistently indicate that a higher level of diversity in income sources negatively affects coffee production efficiency. Additionally, independence in labor resource for coffee farming may help farmers increase technical efficiency of coffee production. Credit loan has a positive and statistically significant relationship with technical efficiency of coffee production. These relationships hold especially true for smallholder coffee farms with ethnic minority household heads. The policy options of credit loan access, intensive investment in coffee production rather than diversification of coffee farmers’ income sources, and independent management strategies for labor sources are suggested as an integrated approach to improve technical efficiency in coffee production of smallholder coffee farms.-
dc.formatPortable Document Format (PDF)-
dc.publisherTrường Đại học Kinh tế Tp. Hồ Chí Minh-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Development-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJED, Vol.23(4)-
dc.subjectCoffee-
dc.subjectCredit-
dc.subjectDakLak-
dc.subjectIncome diversification-
dc.subjectLabor dependence-
dc.subjectTechnical efficiency-
dc.titleLabor dependence, income diversification, rural credit, and technical efficiency ofsmall-holder coffee farms: a case study of Cu M’gar district, Dak Lak province, Vietnam-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.relation.referenceAigner, D. J., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P.(1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production functionmodels. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37.-
dc.relation.referenceAlvarez, A., & Arias, C.(2004). Technical efficiency and farm size: A conditional analysis. AgriculturalEconomics, 30(3), 241–250.http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2004.tb00192.x-
dc.relation.referenceBattese, G. E. (1992).Frontier production functions and technical efficiency: A survey of empiricalapplications in agricultural economics. Agricultural Economics, 7(3–4),185–208.-
dc.relation.referenceBattese, G. E., & Coelli,T. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontierproduction function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20(2),325–332. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205442-
dc.relation.referenceBinam, J. N., Tonyè, J.,Wandji, N., Nyambi, G., & Akoa, M. (2004). Factors affecting the technicalefficiency among smallholder farmers in the slash and burn agriculture zone ofCameroon. Food Policy, 29(5), 531–545.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.07.013-
dc.relation.referenceCoelli, T. (1998). Amulti-stage methodology for the solution of orientated DEA models. OperationsResearch Letters, 23(3–5), 143–149.http://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6377(98)00036-4-
dc.relation.referenceCoelli, T., & Fleming, E.(2004). Diversification economies and specialisation efficiencies in a mixedfood and coffee smallholder farming system in Papua New Guinea. AgriculturalEconomics, 31(2–3), 229–239.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.agecon.2004.09.010-
dc.relation.referenceDak Lak Statistical Office.(2011). Dak Lak Statistical Yearbook 2011. Dak Lak Province, Vietnam:Dak Lak Statistical Office.-
dc.relation.referenceDang, H., & Shively, G.(2008). Coffee boom, coffee bust, and smallholder response in Vietnam’s CentralHighlands. Review of Development Economics, 12(2), 312–326.http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2007.00391.x-
dc.relation.referenceD’haeze, D., Deckers, J.,Raes, D., Tran, A. P., & Nguyen, D. M. C. (2003). Over-irrigation of Coffeacanephora in the Central Highlands of Vietnam revisited: Simulation of soilmoisture dynamics in Rhodic Ferralsols. Agricultural Water Management, 63(3),185–202. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(03)00181-1-
dc.relation.referenceIliyasu, A., Mohamed, Z. A.,Ismail, M. M., Abdullah, A. M., Kamarudin, S. M., & Mazuki, H. (2014). Areview of production frontier research in aquaculture (2001–2011). AquacultureEconomics & Management, 18(3), 221–247. http://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2014.926464-
dc.relation.referenceIllukpitiya, P., &Yanagida, J. F. (2010). Farming vs forests: Trade-off between agriculture andthe extraction of non-timber forest products. Ecological Economics, 69(10),1952–1963. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.007-
dc.relation.referenceKamil, A. A., Fatama, K.,Pinang, P., & Society, M. H. (2009). Technical efficiency in stochasticfrontier production model: An application to the manufacturing industry inBangladesh. Translog, 3(2), 1160–1169.-
dc.relation.referenceKehinde, A. L., Awoyemi, T.T., Omonona, B. T., & Akande, J. A. (2010). Technical efficiency ofsawnwood production in Ondo and Osun states, Nigeria. Journal of ForestEconomics, 16(1), 11–18. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2009.04.001-
dc.relation.referenceKumbhakar, S. C. (1996). Afarm-level study of labor use and efficiency wages in Indian agriculture. Journalof Econometrics, 72(1–2), 177–195.http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01719-0-
dc.relation.referenceMarsh, A. (2007). Diversification by smallholder farmers:Vietnam Robusta Coffee. Agricultural Management, Marketing, and FinanceWorking Document No. 19. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organisation ofthe United Nations.-
dc.relation.referenceMcDonald, J. (2009). Usingleast squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research, 197(2), 792–798.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.039-
dc.relation.referenceMeeusen, W., & van DenBroeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functionswith composed error. International Economic Review, 18(2),435–444.-
dc.relation.referenceMeyfroidt, P., Vu, T. P.,& Hoang, V. A. (2013). Trajectories of deforestation, coffee expansion anddisplacement of shifting cultivation in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. GlobalEnvironmental Change, 23(5), 1187–1198. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.005-
dc.relation.referenceNchare, A. (2007). Analysis of factors affecting technicalefficiency of Arabica coffee producers in Cameroon. AERC Research Paper No.163. Nairobi: African EconomicResearch Consortium.-
dc.relation.referenceNowak-Lehmann, D. F., Herzer,D., Vollmer, S., & Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2011). Modelling the dynamics ofmarket shares in a pooled data setting: Econometric and empirical issues. AppliedEconomics, 43(7), 823–835. http://doi.org/10.1080/00036840802599925-
dc.relation.referenceObwona, M. (2002). Determinants of technical efficiencydifferentials among small- and medium-scale farmers in Uganda : A case oftobacco growers. Kampala, Uganda: Economic Policy Research Center.-
dc.relation.referenceOfori-Bah, A., &Asafu-Adjaye, J. (2011). Scope economies and technical efficiency of cocoaagroforesty systems in Ghana. Ecological Economics, 70(8),1508–1518. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.013-
dc.relation.referencePicazo-Tadeo, A. J.,Gómez-Limón, J. A., & Reig-Martínez, E. (2011). Assessing farmingeco-efficiency: A data envelopment analysis approach. Journal ofEnvironmental Management, 92(4), 1154–1164.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.025-
dc.relation.referencePitt, M. M., & Lee, L. F.(1981). The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesianweaving industry. Journal of Development Economics, 9(1), 43–64.-
dc.relation.referenceRahman, S. (2009). Whethercrop diversification is a desired strategy for agricultural growth inBangladesh? Food Policy, 34(4), 340–349. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.02.004-
dc.relation.referenceTingley, D., Pascoe, S., &Coglan, L. (2005). Factors affecting technical efficiency in fisheries:Stochastic production frontier versus data envelopment analysis approaches. FisheriesResearch, 73(3), 363–376. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2005.01.008-
dc.relation.referenceVedenov, D., Houston, J.,& Cardenas, G. (2007). Production efficiency and diversification in Mexicancoffee-producing districts. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics,39(3), 749–763.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2016.23.4.04-
dc.format.firstpage22-
dc.format.lastpage41-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextOnly abstracts-
Appears in Collections:JABES in English
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.