Advanced
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55283
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNguyen Van Bon-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-14T11:02:26Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-14T11:02:26Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn1859 -1124-
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/55283-
dc.identifier.urihttp://jabes.ueh.edu.vn/Home/SearchArticle?article_Id=e187f9b6-2ecb-4aaf-9327-88926e54f57d-
dc.description.abstractForeign direct investment (FDI) has been strongly affecting the world economy during the past years and is a critical topic for both developing and developed countries. Most countries, particularly developing ones, always attempt to adjust and modify appropriate policies and institutions to attract FDI inflows. In the context of Vietnam, does the institutional quality have any effect on attracting FDI inflows in provinces? To answer clearly and exactly this question, the impact of institutional quality on attracting FDI inflows is empirically investigated in a sample of 43 provinces of Vietnam over the period of 2005–2012 via the estimation technique of difference panel GMM. Estimated results indicate that in the total sample of all provinces the institutional quality has significantly positive effects on the FDI flows. However, in the sub-sample of provinces the impact of the institutional quality on attracting FDI inflows in Northern and Southern regions are statistically significant while that in Central region is not.-
dc.formatPortable Document Format (PDF)-
dc.publisherTrường Đại học Kinh tế Tp. Hồ Chí Minh-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Development-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJED, Vol.22(3)-
dc.subjectInstitutional quality-
dc.subjectForeign direct investment (FDI)-
dc.subjectDifferenced panel GMM-
dc.subjectDrovinces of Vietnam-
dc.titleEffects of institutional quality on FDI inprovinces of Vietnam: empirical evidence based on differenced panel GMM-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.relation.referenceAleksynska,M., & Havrylchyk, O. (2013). FDI from the South: The role of institutionaldistance and natural resources. EuropeanJournal of Political Economy, 29,38–53.-
dc.relation.referenceAnghel, B. (2005). Do institutions affect foreign directinvestment? International Doctorate inEconomic Analysis, 2–40.-
dc.relation.referenceBissoon, O.(2011). Can better institutions attractmore foreign direct investment (FDI)? Evidence from developing countries.International Conference on Applied Economics, 59–70.-
dc.relation.referenceBuchanan, B.G., Le, Q. V., & Rishi, M. (2012). Foreign direct investment andinstitutional quality: Some empirical evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 21, 81–89.-
dc.relation.referenceBusse, M.,& Hefeker, C. (2007). Political risk, institutions and foreign directinvestment. European Journal of PoliticalEconomy, 23, 397–415.-
dc.relation.referenceDang, D. A.(2013). How foreign direct investment promote institutional quality: Evidencefrom Vietnam. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(4), 1054–1072.-
dc.relation.referenceDu, J., Lu,Y., & Tao, Z. (2008). Economic institutions and FDI location choice:Evidence from US multinationals in China. Journalof Comparative Economics, 36,412–429.-
dc.relation.referenceDunning, J. H.(1977). Trade, location of economic activity and the MNE: A search for aneclectic approach. In B. Ohlin, P. Hesselborn & M. Wijkman (eds.), The international allocation of economicactivity (pp. 395–418). New York: Holmes and Meier.-
dc.relation.referenceDunning, J. H.(1993). Multinational enterprises and theglobal economy. U.K.: Addison-Wesley, Workingham.-
dc.relation.referenceDunning, J. H.(2006). Comments on dragon multinationals: New players in 21stcentury globalization. Asian PacificJournal of Management, 23,139–141.-
dc.relation.referenceDunning, J.H., & Lundan, S. (2008). Institutions and the OLI paradigm of themultinational enterprise. Asia PacificJournal of Management, 25,573–593.-
dc.relation.referenceHoskisson, R.,Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategies in emergingeconomies. Academy of Management Journal,43, 249–269.-
dc.relation.referenceJadhav, P.(2012). Determinants of foreign direct investment in BRICS economies: Analysisof economic, institutional, and political factor. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 37, 5–14.-
dc.relation.referenceKang, Y.,& Jiang, F. (2012). FDI location choice of Chinese multinationals in Eastand Southeast Asia: Traditional economic factors and institutional perspective.Journal of World Business, 47, 45–53.-
dc.relation.referenceKostova, T.,& Zaheer, S. (1999). Organisational legitimacy under conditions ofcomplexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24,64–81.-
dc.relation.referenceKuzmina, O.,Volchkova, N., & Zueva, T. (2014). Foreign direct investment and governancequality in Russia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 42(4), 874–891.-
dc.relation.referenceMalesky, E. J.(2008). Straight ahead on red: How direct investment empowers sub-nationalleaders. Journal of Politics, 70(1), 97–119.-
dc.relation.referenceMalesky, E.J., Taussig, M. D. (2009). Out of gray: The impact of provincial institutionson business formalization in Vietnam. Journalof East Asian Studies, 9(2),249–290.-
dc.relation.referenceMina, W. M.(2012). The institutional reforms debate and FDI flows to the MENA region: The“best” ensemble. World Development, 40, 1798–1809.-
dc.relation.referenceNguyen, T. T.,Dijk, M. A. van (2012). Corruption, growth, and governance: Private vs. stateowned firms in Vietnam. Journal ofBanking and Finance, 36(11),2935–2948.-
dc.relation.referencePeng, M. W.,Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view ofinternational business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies,39, 920–936.-
dc.relation.referenceSethi, D.,Guisinger, S., Ford, D. L., & Phelan, S. E. (2002). Seeking greenerpastures: A theoretical and empirical investigation into the changing trend offoreign direct investment flows in response to institutional and strategicfactors. International Business Review,11, 685–705.-
dc.relation.referenceStoian, C.(2013). Extending Dunning's investment development path: The role of homecountry institutional determinants in explaining outward foreign directinvestment. International Business Review,22, 615–637.-
dc.relation.referenceTintin, C.(2013). The determinants of foreign direct investment inflows in the Centraland Eastern European Countries: The importance of institutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 46, 287–298.-
dc.relation.referenceTran, B. T.,Grafton, Q. R., & Kompas, T. (2008). Institutions matter: The case ofVietnam. Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 1–12.-
dc.relation.referenceVu, T. A. T.,Le, T. V., & Vo, T. T. (2007). Provincial extralegal investment incentivesin the context of decentralisation in Vietnam: Mutually beneficial or a race tothe bottom? United Nations DevelopmentProgram Vietnam Working Paper Series, Hanoi, Vietnam.-
dc.relation.referenceWang, D. T.,Gu, F. F., Tse, D. K., & Yim, C. K. B. (2013). When does FDI matter? Theroles of local institutions and ethnic origins of FDI. International Business Review, 22,450–465.-
dc.relation.referenceWernick, D.A., Haar, J., & Singh, S. (2009). Do governing institutions affect foreigndirect investment inflows? New evidence from emerging economies. International Journal of Economics andBusiness Research, 1, 317–332.-
dc.relation.referenceZukin, S.,& DiMaggio, P. (1990). Structures ofcapital: The social organization of the economy. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.-
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.24311/jed/2015.22.3.04-
dc.format.firstpage26-
dc.format.lastpage45-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextOnly abstracts-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
Appears in Collections:JABES in English
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.