Advanced
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/69566
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOnesmo Z. Sigallaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMadaka Tumboen_US
dc.contributor.authorJane Josephen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-05T04:15:16Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-05T04:15:16Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/69566-
dc.description.abstractMulti-stakeholder platforms (MSPs) have gained momentum in addressing contentious and cross-sectoral aspects of natural resources management. They have helped to enhance cross-learning and the inclusion of marginalized groups. Tanzania’s water resources management sub-sector has championed these platforms as a means of breaking silos around planning, coordination, and resource mobilization. However, it is not uncommon to experience the occasional dominance of some influential sectors or groups due to their resources contribution to the process, contemporary influence, or statutory authority. Between 2013 and 2020, Tanzania has pioneered the establishment of MSPs at a national level and across the river and lake basins. This paper examines the representation of stakeholder groups in these platforms. Additionally, it establishes the baseline information that contributes to unlocking the current project-based platform design characterized by inherent limitations to potential changes in stakeholders’ attitudes and actions. The research analyzed stakeholder’s views, their representation, and the local and international literature to formulate opinions. Findings indicated that gender equality had not been adhered to despite being in the guidelines for establishing MSPs. The balance of public, private, and civil society organizations (CSOs) is acutely dominated by the public sector organizations, especially water-related ones. Finally, participation on the decision-making level is minimal, causing unsustainable platforms unless development partners continue to support operational costs.en_US
dc.format.mediumpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.subjectrepresentationen_US
dc.subjectMSPen_US
dc.subjectStakeholdersen_US
dc.subjectstakeholders’ engagementen_US
dc.subjectWater governanceen_US
dc.titleMulti-Stakeholder Platform in Water Resources Management: A Critical Analysis of Stakeholders’ Participation for Sustainable Water Resourcesen_US
item.grantfulltextreserved-
item.fulltextFull texts-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Tài nguyên nước
Files in This Item:

File

Description

Size

Format

Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.