Advanced
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/76458
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheng Li-
dc.contributor.authorHui Yao-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-06T03:12:28Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-06T03:12:28Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn2515-964X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.emerald.com/jabes/article/31/4/277/1230516/Are-government-budgets-a-visible-stabilizer-
dc.identifier.urihttps://digital.lib.ueh.edu.vn/handle/UEH/76458-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study quantitatively examines the relationship between economic fluctuations and government budget size in the context of China’s fiscal decentralization, drawing inspiration from theoretical predictions of the Keynesian view and empirical studies on other economies. Design/methodology/approach: The panel comprises 31 provinces or equivalents in mainland China, spanning from 1994 to 2019. Diverse estimation strategies including two-way fixed effect regression, the generalized method of moments (GMM) and threshold regressions are, utilized. Findings: The results suggest that under the “tax-assignment system”, neither the central government’s fiscal transfers nor the provincial budgetary revenues or expenditures help reduce economic volatility. Surprisingly, some regression outcomes suggest that government size measures destabilize business cycles. Originality/value: While the study does not provide supportive evidence for the stabilizing effect of public budgets in Chinese provinces, it promotes a rethinking of the government’s intricate role in macroeconomic stabilization in the context of China’s fiscal decentralization.vi
dc.publisherEmerald Publishing Limitedvi
dc.publisherUniversity of Economics Ho Chi Minh Cityvi
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Asian Business and Economic Studiesvi
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJABES, Vol.31(4)-
dc.subjectGovernment budgetsvi
dc.subjectBusiness cyclesvi
dc.subjectFiscal decentralizationvi
dc.titleAre government budgets a visible stabilizer? Evidence from China since the tax-assignment reformvi
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-06-2023-0205-
dc.format.firstpage277-
dc.format.lastpage289-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextOnly abstracts-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
Appears in Collections:JABES in English
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.